From: phil@raspberrypi.org (Phil Elwell)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] bcm2835: auxiliar device support for spi
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:02:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F1B7B7.3050604@raspberrypi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8B777380-A2A1-475E-8A1C-942BF28EE160@martin.sperl.org>
[ Sending again in plain text ]
Noralf pointed me at fixed-factor-clock, and that works in our
(downstream) environment:
soc: soc {
...
uart1: uart at 7e215040 {
compatible = "brcm,bcm2835-aux-uart", "ns16550";
reg = <0x7e215040 0x40>;
interrupts = <1 29>;
clocks = <&clk_uart1>;
reg-shift = <2>;
no-loopback-test;
status = "disabled";
};
};
clocks: clocks {
...
clk_core: clock at 2 {
compatible = "fixed-clock";
reg = <2>;
#clock-cells = <0>;
clock-output-names = "core";
clock-frequency = <250000000>;
};
...
clk_uart1: clock at 6 {
compatible = "fixed-factor-clock";
clocks = <&clk_core>;
#clock-cells = <0>;
clock-div = <1>;
clock-mult = <2>;
};
};
Phil
On 10/09/2015 16:57, Martin Sperl wrote:
>> On 10.09.2015, at 17:48, Noralf Tr?nnes <noralf@tronnes.org> wrote:
>>
>> This looks interesting.
>> But there's a challenge with the uart1 and the 8250 driver.
>>
>> Phil Elwell has this to say:
>> This means that that UART1 isn't an exact clone of a 8250 UART.
>> In a particular, the clock divisor is calculated differently.
>> A standard 8250 derives the baud rate as clock/(divisor16),
>> whereas the BCM2835 mini UART uses clock/(divisor8). This means
>> that if you want to use the standard driver then you need to lie
>> about the clock frequency, providing a value is twice the real
>> value, in order for a suitable divisor to be calculated.
>>
>> Ref: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/pull/1008#issuecomment-139234607
>>
>> So either we need a new uart1 driver or a doubled clock freq. somehow.
> Found out the same thing and communicated it to Eric - not
> knowing about the different divider?
>
> Martin
On 10/09/2015 16:57, Martin Sperl wrote:
>> On 10.09.2015, at 17:48, Noralf Tr?nnes <noralf@tronnes.org> wrote:
>>
>> This looks interesting.
>> But there's a challenge with the uart1 and the 8250 driver.
>>
>> Phil Elwell has this to say:
>> This means that that UART1 isn't an exact clone of a 8250 UART.
>> In a particular, the clock divisor is calculated differently.
>> A standard 8250 derives the baud rate as clock/(divisor16),
>> whereas the BCM2835 mini UART uses clock/(divisor8). This means
>> that if you want to use the standard driver then you need to lie
>> about the clock frequency, providing a value is twice the real
>> value, in order for a suitable divisor to be calculated.
>>
>> Ref: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/pull/1008#issuecomment-139234607
>>
>> So either we need a new uart1 driver or a doubled clock freq. somehow.
> Found out the same thing and communicated it to Eric - not
> knowing about the different divider?
>
> Martin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-10 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-04 9:41 [PATCH v5 0/6] bcm2835: auxiliar device support for spi kernel at martin.sperl.org
2015-09-04 9:41 ` [PATCH 1/6] soc: bcm2835: auxiliar devices enable infrastructure kernel at martin.sperl.org
2015-09-04 9:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] ARM: bcm2835: add DT for the bcm2835 auxiliar devices kernel at martin.sperl.org
2015-09-04 9:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] dt/bindings: bcm2835: add binding documentation for bcm2835-aux kernel at martin.sperl.org
2015-09-04 9:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] spi: bcm2835: new driver implementing auxiliar spi1/spi2 on the bcm2835 soc kernel at martin.sperl.org
2015-09-09 2:20 ` Eric Anholt
2015-09-04 9:41 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] ARM: bcm2835: enable building of spi-bcm2835aux driver in default config kernel at martin.sperl.org
2015-09-04 9:41 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] dt/bindings: bcm2835: Add binding documentation for auxiliar spi devices kernel at martin.sperl.org
2015-09-09 1:48 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] bcm2835: auxiliar device support for spi Eric Anholt
2015-09-09 9:00 ` Alexander Stein
2015-09-09 18:27 ` Eric Anholt
2015-09-10 15:48 ` Noralf Trønnes
2015-09-10 15:57 ` Martin Sperl
2015-09-10 17:02 ` Phil Elwell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F1B7B7.3050604@raspberrypi.org \
--to=phil@raspberrypi.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).