From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:49:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55F295A7.20406@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55F1EB81.9030908@redhat.com>
On 10/09/15 21:43, Al Stone wrote:
> On 09/10/2015 10:20 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>
[...]
>>
>> From the code inspection, I can see we have 3 users of acpi_parse_entries not
>> just MADT but also PCC and NUMA/SRAT
>>
>> Something like this solves this issue:
>> - if (bad_madt_entry(table_header, entry))
>> + if (!strncmp(id, ACPI_SIG_MADT, 4) &&
>> + bad_madt_entry(table_header, entry)
>>
>>
>> Or am I still missing something ?
>
> Nope, I missed it. Your fix above will solve the problem; I misunderstood
> how acpi_parse_entries() was being used -- somehow I had it in my head that
> only MADT was in use, and just not seeing that it's being used for several
> other subtable traversals also. Sorry about that, Sudeep. My mistake.
>
No worries.
> I'll add this fix for a v4, but I'll wait for a few days to see if I get any
> additional comments -- I haven't heard from any x86, ia64 or ACPI maintainers
Makes sense.
> yet. OTOH, it's nice to know we've already found and fixed two sets of arm64
> ACPI tables that are in error by using these patches, even with the flaws :).
>
Very much true indeed :)
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-11 8:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-19 22:07 [PATCH v2 0/5] ACPI: Provide better MADT subtable sanity checks Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ACPI: add in a bad_madt_entry() function to eventually replace the macro Al Stone
2015-08-26 15:38 ` Timur Tabi
2015-08-26 20:30 ` Al Stone
2015-09-07 15:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-08 23:00 ` Al Stone
2015-09-09 19:57 ` Al Stone
2015-09-10 16:20 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-09-10 20:43 ` Al Stone
2015-09-11 8:49 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ACPI / ARM64: remove usage of BAD_MADT_ENTRY/BAD_MADT_GICC_ENTRY Al Stone
2015-08-20 10:13 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-20 16:57 ` Al Stone
2015-08-24 10:04 ` Will Deacon
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ACPI / IA64: remove usage of BAD_MADT_ENTRY Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ACPI / X86: " Al Stone
2015-08-19 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ACPI: remove definition of BAD_MADT_ENTRY macro Al Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55F295A7.20406@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).