From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alim.akhtar@samsung.com (Alim Akhtar) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 11:46:33 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: Add BUS1 instance pinctrl support In-Reply-To: <55F6606F.3090000@samsung.com> References: <1440761134-27639-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com> <55E3E95D.50003@samsung.com> <55F6563A.2030107@samsung.com> <55F6606F.3090000@samsung.com> Message-ID: <55F66641.6010209@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On 09/14/2015 11:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 14.09.2015 14:08, Alim Akhtar wrote: >> Hi >> >> On 08/31/2015 11:12 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>> On 28.08.2015 20:25, Alim Akhtar wrote: >>>> This adds BUS1 instance pinctrl for exynos7 soc. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7-pinctrl.dtsi | 111 >>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos7.dtsi | 7 ++ >>>> 2 files changed, 118 insertions(+) >>> >>> The "etc1" GPIO in my datasheet is not fully documented but the rest >>> looks good: >>> >> Ok will send v2 and remove etc1 gpio node. > > You don't have to. I mentioned it only for reference that I cannot > review the etc GPIO node because it is not mentioned in my datasheet. > However you may have different (e.g. newer) datasheet and etc1 could be > documented there. > Sorry for delay, I check two versions of the UM and unfortunately both show incomplete entries for etc1, my downstream code has these changes though. > I applied the first version of patch some time ago (your response is > after two weeks). Do you want me to replace it with v2? > Please consider taking my v2 which I just posted. Thanks again. > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > >