* [PATCH v5 1/4] PM / OPP: add dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() helper
2015-09-08 16:41 [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2015-09-08 16:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-09-08 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] cpufreq: allow cpufreq_generic_suspend() to work without suspend frequency Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2015-09-08 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Add dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() helper to obtain suspend opp.
Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
---
drivers/base/power/opp.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/linux/pm_opp.h | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
index eb25449..3d948ea 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
@@ -341,6 +341,36 @@ unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_max_clock_latency(struct device *dev)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_max_clock_latency);
/**
+ * dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() - Get suspend opp
+ * @dev: device for which we do this operation
+ *
+ * Return: This function returns pointer to the suspend opp if it is
+ * defined, otherwise it returns NULL.
+ *
+ * Locking: This function must be called under rcu_read_lock(). opp is a rcu
+ * protected pointer. The reason for the same is that the opp pointer which is
+ * returned will remain valid for use with opp_get_{voltage, freq} only while
+ * under the locked area. The pointer returned must be used prior to unlocking
+ * with rcu_read_unlock() to maintain the integrity of the pointer.
+ */
+struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct device_opp *dev_opp;
+ struct dev_pm_opp *opp;
+
+ opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
+
+ dev_opp = _find_device_opp(dev);
+ if (IS_ERR(dev_opp))
+ opp = NULL;
+ else
+ opp = dev_opp->suspend_opp;
+
+ return opp;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp);
+
+/**
* dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() - Get number of opps available in the opp list
* @dev: device for which we do this operation
*
diff --git a/include/linux/pm_opp.h b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
index cab7ba5..e817722 100644
--- a/include/linux/pm_opp.h
+++ b/include/linux/pm_opp.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ bool dev_pm_opp_is_turbo(struct dev_pm_opp *opp);
int dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(struct device *dev);
unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_max_clock_latency(struct device *dev);
+struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp(struct device *dev);
struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(struct device *dev,
unsigned long freq,
@@ -80,6 +81,11 @@ static inline unsigned long dev_pm_opp_get_max_clock_latency(struct device *dev)
return 0;
}
+static inline struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
static inline struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(struct device *dev,
unsigned long freq, bool available)
{
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v5 2/4] cpufreq: allow cpufreq_generic_suspend() to work without suspend frequency
2015-09-08 16:41 [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-09-08 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] PM / OPP: add dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() helper Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2015-09-08 16:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-09-08 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2015-09-08 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Some cpufreq drivers may set suspend frequency only for
selected setups but still would like to use the generic
suspend handler. Thus don't treat !policy->suspend_freq
condition as an incorrect one.
Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index b3d9368..a634fcb 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1626,8 +1626,8 @@ int cpufreq_generic_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
int ret;
if (!policy->suspend_freq) {
- pr_err("%s: suspend_freq can't be zero\n", __func__);
- return -EINVAL;
+ pr_debug("%s: suspend_freq not defined\n", __func__);
+ return 0;
}
pr_debug("%s: Setting suspend-freq: %u\n", __func__,
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v5 3/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support
2015-09-08 16:41 [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-09-08 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] PM / OPP: add dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() helper Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-09-08 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] cpufreq: allow cpufreq_generic_suspend() to work without suspend frequency Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2015-09-08 16:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-09-08 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ARM: dts: add suspend opp to exynos4412 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-09-09 1:16 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support Rafael J. Wysocki
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2015-09-08 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Add suspend frequency support and if needed set it to
the frequency obtained from the suspend opp (can be defined
using opp-v2 bindings and is optional).
Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c | 9 +++++++++
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
index c3583cd..9b5e7c9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt.c
@@ -196,6 +196,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
struct device *cpu_dev;
struct regulator *cpu_reg;
struct clk *cpu_clk;
+ struct dev_pm_opp *suspend_opp;
unsigned long min_uV = ~0, max_uV = 0;
unsigned int transition_latency;
bool need_update = false;
@@ -329,6 +330,13 @@ static int cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
policy->driver_data = priv;
policy->clk = cpu_clk;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ suspend_opp = dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp(cpu_dev);
+ if (suspend_opp)
+ policy->suspend_freq = dev_pm_opp_get_freq(suspend_opp) / 1000;
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, freq_table);
if (ret) {
dev_err(cpu_dev, "%s: invalid frequency table: %d\n", __func__,
@@ -419,6 +427,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver dt_cpufreq_driver = {
.ready = cpufreq_ready,
.name = "cpufreq-dt",
.attr = cpufreq_dt_attr,
+ .suspend = cpufreq_generic_suspend,
};
static int dt_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v5 4/4] ARM: dts: add suspend opp to exynos4412
2015-09-08 16:41 [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-09-08 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2015-09-08 16:41 ` Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2015-09-09 1:16 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support Rafael J. Wysocki
4 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz @ 2015-09-08 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Mark 800MHz OPP as a suspend opp for Exynos4412 based
boards so effectively cpufreq-dt driver behavior w.r.t.
suspend frequency matches what the old exynos-cpufreq
driver has been doing.
This patch fixes suspend/resume support on Exynos4412 based
Trats2 board and reboot hang on Exynos4412 based Odroid U3
board.
Cc: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>
Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Tobias Jakobi <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi
index ca0e3c1..294cfe4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4412.dtsi
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <800000000>;
opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
clock-latency-ns = <200000>;
+ opp-suspend;
};
opp07 {
opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <900000000>;
--
1.9.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support
2015-09-08 16:41 [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-09-08 16:41 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ARM: dts: add suspend opp to exynos4412 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
@ 2015-09-09 1:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-09-14 7:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
4 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2015-09-09 1:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tuesday, September 08, 2015 06:41:00 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This patch series adds suspend frequency support (using opp-v2
> bindings and suspend-opp functionality) to cpufreq-dt driver and
> then adds suspend opp for Exynos4412 based boards.
>
> This patch series fixes suspend/resume support on Exynos4412
> based Trats2 board and reboot hang on Exynos4412 based Odroid
> U3 board.
>
> Changes since v4:
> - removed superfluous CONFIG_PM ifdefs
> - added Acked-by tag from Krzysztof to patch #4
> - added Acked-by tag from Viresh to patches #1-3
>
> Changes since v3:
> - fixed dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() locking
> - shortened variable name in dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp()
> - adjusted cpufreq_generic_suspend() to work with cpufreq-dt
> - removed no longer needed cpufreq_dt_suspend()
> - added Acked-by tag from Viresh to patch #4
>
> Changes since v2:
> - rewrote to use suspend-opp functionality
>
> Changes since v1:
> - removed superfluous ";"
>
> Depends on:
> - next-20150902 branch of linux-next kernel tree
I've queued up [1-3/4] for the next PM pull request.
The [4/4] has to go in separately through the platform tree.
Thanks,
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support
2015-09-09 1:16 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2015-09-14 7:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-09-14 7:17 ` Viresh Kumar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2015-09-14 7:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 09.09.2015 10:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 08, 2015 06:41:00 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch series adds suspend frequency support (using opp-v2
>> bindings and suspend-opp functionality) to cpufreq-dt driver and
>> then adds suspend opp for Exynos4412 based boards.
>>
>> This patch series fixes suspend/resume support on Exynos4412
>> based Trats2 board and reboot hang on Exynos4412 based Odroid
>> U3 board.
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>> - removed superfluous CONFIG_PM ifdefs
>> - added Acked-by tag from Krzysztof to patch #4
>> - added Acked-by tag from Viresh to patches #1-3
>>
>> Changes since v3:
>> - fixed dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp() locking
>> - shortened variable name in dev_pm_opp_get_suspend_opp()
>> - adjusted cpufreq_generic_suspend() to work with cpufreq-dt
>> - removed no longer needed cpufreq_dt_suspend()
>> - added Acked-by tag from Viresh to patch #4
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - rewrote to use suspend-opp functionality
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - removed superfluous ";"
>>
>> Depends on:
>> - next-20150902 branch of linux-next kernel tree
>
> I've queued up [1-3/4] for the next PM pull request.
>
> The [4/4] has to go in separately through the platform tree.
Dear Rafael,
If you want, the fourth patch can go now through your tree - the late
SoC changes were pulled by Linus. No difference... I can grab it as I
had other DT related fix in queue.
The only important thing is to get entire patchset to 4.3 because it is
a fix for regression introduced in cpufreq for exynos. Do you plan to
send your part in current 4.3 cycle?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support
2015-09-14 7:08 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2015-09-14 7:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-09-14 7:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2015-09-14 7:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 14-09-15, 16:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> If you want, the fourth patch can go now through your tree - the late
> SoC changes were pulled by Linus. No difference... I can grab it as I
> had other DT related fix in queue.
>
> The only important thing is to get entire patchset to 4.3 because it is
> a fix for regression introduced in cpufreq for exynos. Do you plan to
> send your part in current 4.3 cycle?
The first 3 patches are already part for 4.3-rc1 and so you can keep
the DT update in your tree now. :)
--
viresh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v5 0/4] cpufreq-dt: add suspend frequency support
2015-09-14 7:17 ` Viresh Kumar
@ 2015-09-14 7:19 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2015-09-14 7:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 14.09.2015 16:17, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 14-09-15, 16:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> If you want, the fourth patch can go now through your tree - the late
>> SoC changes were pulled by Linus. No difference... I can grab it as I
>> had other DT related fix in queue.
>>
>> The only important thing is to get entire patchset to 4.3 because it is
>> a fix for regression introduced in cpufreq for exynos. Do you plan to
>> send your part in current 4.3 cycle?
>
> The first 3 patches are already part for 4.3-rc1 and so you can keep
> the DT update in your tree now. :)
Damn it, I missed it. It solves everything, the fourth patch will go
through platform tree.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread