[linux-sunxi] [PATCH] musb: sunxi: Ignore VBus errors in host-only mode

[hdegoede@redhat.com (Hans de Goede)]

Hi,

On 14-09-15 16:44, Bin Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10-09-15 20:30, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 08:23:23PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On 04-09-15 08:43, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hey Hans,
>>>>>
>>>>> On 07-08-15 10:45, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you change the dr_mode to host then you _must_ also remove any
>>>>>>> id_det and vbus_det
>>>>>>> gpio settings from the usb_phy node in the dts, as the sun4i phy code
>>>>>>> detects
>>>>>>> host vs otg mode by checking for the presence of these.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, this fixes it and makes it work. Thanks.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I've been going back to this and am wondering if this is something I can
>>>>> look into to fix properly? E.g. if the dts sets dr_mode = host, can we
>>>>> simply ignore the pins and treat them as unset?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK you cannot unset something in dts. The only solution I
>>>> can comeup with is to add a dr_mode argument to the phy like
>>>> we already have for the otg controller itself.
>>>>
>>>> This is something which we likely need to do anyways to add
>>>> support for peripheral only mode, which we seem to need for
>>>> some "hdmi sticks".
>>>
>>>
>>> I haven't really followed the rest of the discussion, so sorry if you
>>> already talked about that, but why can't you just set the dr_mode to
>>> peripheral in such a case?
>>
>>
>> This is about the usbphy code not the musb-controller code, which are
>> 2 different dts nodes, atm only the musb-controller node has a
>> dr_mode property, and the phy code decides between host-only
>> and otg mode based on whether an id pin is assigned or not.
>>
>> My proposal is to get rid of the id-pin hack to determine the mode
>> and add a dr_mode property to the usbphy dts node.
>
> I would try to avoid adding dr_mode in the usbphy node if possible,
> since it is already specified in the controller node.
>
> Since the phy node is referenced in the controller node, is it
> possible that the phy driver looks up the controller of properties to
> find its dr_mode setting?

That is possible, but it very much goes against how devicetree normally
works, where every node is more or less a standalone unit which
contains enough info for the associated driver to do its work.

Currently there is no link from the phy node to the controller node
(only the other way around) and adding such a link requires more code
then simple having a duplicate dr_mode.

Regards,

Hans