* [PATCH] spmi-pmic-arb: support configurable number of peripherals
@ 2015-09-14 21:54 Stephen Boyd
2015-09-15 1:28 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2015-09-14 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
The current driver implementation supports only 128 peripherals.
Add support for more than 128 peripherals by taking a lazy
caching approach to the mapping tables. Instead of reading the
tables at boot given some fixed size, read them on an as needed
basis and cache the results. We still assume a max number of 512
peripherals, trading off some space for simplicity.
Based on a patch by Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org> and
Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
This replaces a previous patch from Gilad and Sagar. I've
added some commit text and made it into a proper patch.
drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
index c7aa6f1a898e..0cd86d96bb7d 100644
--- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
+++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*/
+#include <linux/bitmap.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
@@ -47,9 +48,9 @@
#define SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_FLAG(X) (((X) >> 8) & 0x1)
#define SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(X) (((X) >> 0) & 0xFF)
-#define SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_LEN 255
#define SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_TREE_DEPTH 16 /* Maximum of 16-bits */
-#define PPID_TO_CHAN_TABLE_SZ BIT(12) /* PPID is 12bit chan is 1byte*/
+#define PMIC_ARB_MAX_PPID BIT(12) /* PPID is 12bit */
+#define PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID BIT(15)
/* Ownership Table */
#define SPMI_OWNERSHIP_TABLE_REG(N) (0x0700 + (4 * (N)))
@@ -85,9 +86,7 @@ enum pmic_arb_cmd_op_code {
};
/* Maximum number of support PMIC peripherals */
-#define PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS 256
-#define PMIC_ARB_MAX_CHNL 128
-#define PMIC_ARB_PERIPH_ID_VALID (1 << 15)
+#define PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS 512
#define PMIC_ARB_TIMEOUT_US 100
#define PMIC_ARB_MAX_TRANS_BYTES (8)
@@ -125,18 +124,21 @@ struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev {
void __iomem *wr_base;
void __iomem *intr;
void __iomem *cnfg;
+ void __iomem *core;
raw_spinlock_t lock;
u8 channel;
int irq;
u8 ee;
- u8 min_apid;
- u8 max_apid;
- u32 mapping_table[SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_LEN];
+ u16 min_apid;
+ u16 max_apid;
+ u32 *mapping_table;
+ DECLARE_BITMAP(mapping_table_valid, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS);
struct irq_domain *domain;
struct spmi_controller *spmic;
- u16 apid_to_ppid[256];
+ u16 *apid_to_ppid;
const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops *ver_ops;
- u8 *ppid_to_chan;
+ u16 *ppid_to_chan;
+ u16 last_channel;
};
/**
@@ -614,6 +616,10 @@ static int search_mapping_table(struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa,
u32 data;
for (i = 0; i < SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_TREE_DEPTH; ++i) {
+ if (!test_and_set_bit(index, pa->mapping_table_valid))
+ mapping_table[index] = readl_relaxed(pa->cnfg +
+ SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_REG(index));
+
data = mapping_table[index];
if (ppid & (1 << SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_INDEX(data))) {
@@ -706,11 +712,42 @@ static u32 pmic_arb_offset_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa, u8 sid, u16 addr)
return 0x800 + 0x80 * pa->channel;
}
+static u16 pmic_arb_find_chan(struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa, u16 ppid)
+{
+ u32 regval;
+ u16 chan;
+ u16 id;
+
+ /*
+ * PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL is a table in HW mapping channel to ppid.
+ * ppid_to_chan is an in-memory invert of that table.
+ */
+ for (chan = pa->last_channel; ; chan++) {
+ regval = readl_relaxed(pa->core + PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL(chan));
+ if (!regval)
+ continue;
+
+ id = (regval >> 8) & PMIC_ARB_PPID_MASK;
+ pa->ppid_to_chan[id] = chan | PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID;
+ if (id == ppid)
+ break;
+ }
+ pa->last_channel = chan;
+
+ return chan;
+}
+
+
/* v2 offset per ppid (chan) and per ee */
static u32 pmic_arb_offset_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa, u8 sid, u16 addr)
{
u16 ppid = (sid << 8) | (addr >> 8);
- u8 chan = pa->ppid_to_chan[ppid];
+ u16 chan;
+
+ chan = pa->ppid_to_chan[ppid];
+ if (!(chan & PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID))
+ chan = pmic_arb_find_chan(pa, ppid);
+ chan &= ~PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID;
return 0x1000 * pa->ee + 0x8000 * chan;
}
@@ -797,7 +834,7 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct resource *res;
void __iomem *core;
u32 channel, ee, hw_ver;
- int err, i;
+ int err;
bool is_v1;
ctrl = spmi_controller_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pa));
@@ -825,10 +862,7 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pa->wr_base = core;
pa->rd_base = core;
} else {
- u8 chan;
- u16 ppid;
- u32 regval;
-
+ pa->core = core;
pa->ver_ops = &pmic_arb_v2;
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
@@ -847,24 +881,14 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_put_ctrl;
}
- pa->ppid_to_chan = devm_kzalloc(&ctrl->dev,
- PPID_TO_CHAN_TABLE_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
+ pa->ppid_to_chan = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev,
+ PMIC_ARB_MAX_PPID,
+ sizeof(*pa->ppid_to_chan),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
if (!pa->ppid_to_chan) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_put_ctrl;
}
- /*
- * PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL is a table in HW mapping channel to ppid.
- * ppid_to_chan is an in-memory invert of that table.
- */
- for (chan = 0; chan < PMIC_ARB_MAX_CHNL; ++chan) {
- regval = readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL(chan));
- if (!regval)
- continue;
-
- ppid = (regval >> 8) & 0xFFF;
- pa->ppid_to_chan[ppid] = chan;
- }
}
res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "intr");
@@ -915,9 +939,20 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
pa->ee = ee;
- for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pa->mapping_table); ++i)
- pa->mapping_table[i] = readl_relaxed(
- pa->cnfg + SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_REG(i));
+ pa->apid_to_ppid = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS,
+ sizeof(*pa->apid_to_ppid),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pa->apid_to_ppid) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_put_ctrl;
+ }
+
+ pa->mapping_table = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS - 1,
+ sizeof(*pa->mapping_table), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!pa->mapping_table) {
+ err = -ENOMEM;
+ goto err_put_ctrl;
+ }
/* Initialize max_apid/min_apid to the opposite bounds, during
* the irq domain translation, we are sure to update these */
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] spmi-pmic-arb: support configurable number of peripherals
2015-09-14 21:54 [PATCH] spmi-pmic-arb: support configurable number of peripherals Stephen Boyd
@ 2015-09-15 1:28 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-15 11:20 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2015-09-15 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 09/14/2015 02:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> The current driver implementation supports only 128 peripherals.
> Add support for more than 128 peripherals by taking a lazy
> caching approach to the mapping tables. Instead of reading the
> tables at boot given some fixed size, read them on an as needed
> basis and cache the results. We still assume a max number of 512
> peripherals, trading off some space for simplicity.
>
> Based on a patch by Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org> and
> Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> ---
Hi Ivan,
This patch causes 8916 to crash, because there isn't a mapping for ppid
257 in the ppid to channel table. It seems that we're reading the revid
from the slave id 1 pmic by going through channel 0, which seems to be
setup for ppid 9 (slave id 0 and the peripheral starting at 0x900). Can
we stop reading the revid registers from non-zero slave id pmic devices?
That would be one solution to fix this problem. Or maybe we need to
special case this in the pmic arbiter code to fold ppid 0xN01 (slave id
N and address 0x100) onto channel 0 all the time?
-Stephen
> This replaces a previous patch from Gilad and Sagar. I've
> added some commit text and made it into a proper patch.
>
> drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> index c7aa6f1a898e..0cd86d96bb7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> +++ b/drivers/spmi/spmi-pmic-arb.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> * GNU General Public License for more details.
> */
> +#include <linux/bitmap.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/err.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> @@ -47,9 +48,9 @@
> #define SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_FLAG(X) (((X) >> 8) & 0x1)
> #define SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_IS_1_RESULT(X) (((X) >> 0) & 0xFF)
>
> -#define SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_LEN 255
> #define SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_TREE_DEPTH 16 /* Maximum of 16-bits */
> -#define PPID_TO_CHAN_TABLE_SZ BIT(12) /* PPID is 12bit chan is 1byte*/
> +#define PMIC_ARB_MAX_PPID BIT(12) /* PPID is 12bit */
> +#define PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID BIT(15)
>
> /* Ownership Table */
> #define SPMI_OWNERSHIP_TABLE_REG(N) (0x0700 + (4 * (N)))
> @@ -85,9 +86,7 @@ enum pmic_arb_cmd_op_code {
> };
>
> /* Maximum number of support PMIC peripherals */
> -#define PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS 256
> -#define PMIC_ARB_MAX_CHNL 128
> -#define PMIC_ARB_PERIPH_ID_VALID (1 << 15)
> +#define PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS 512
> #define PMIC_ARB_TIMEOUT_US 100
> #define PMIC_ARB_MAX_TRANS_BYTES (8)
>
> @@ -125,18 +124,21 @@ struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev {
> void __iomem *wr_base;
> void __iomem *intr;
> void __iomem *cnfg;
> + void __iomem *core;
> raw_spinlock_t lock;
> u8 channel;
> int irq;
> u8 ee;
> - u8 min_apid;
> - u8 max_apid;
> - u32 mapping_table[SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_LEN];
> + u16 min_apid;
> + u16 max_apid;
> + u32 *mapping_table;
> + DECLARE_BITMAP(mapping_table_valid, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS);
> struct irq_domain *domain;
> struct spmi_controller *spmic;
> - u16 apid_to_ppid[256];
> + u16 *apid_to_ppid;
> const struct pmic_arb_ver_ops *ver_ops;
> - u8 *ppid_to_chan;
> + u16 *ppid_to_chan;
> + u16 last_channel;
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -614,6 +616,10 @@ static int search_mapping_table(struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa,
> u32 data;
>
> for (i = 0; i < SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_TREE_DEPTH; ++i) {
> + if (!test_and_set_bit(index, pa->mapping_table_valid))
> + mapping_table[index] = readl_relaxed(pa->cnfg +
> + SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_REG(index));
> +
> data = mapping_table[index];
>
> if (ppid & (1 << SPMI_MAPPING_BIT_INDEX(data))) {
> @@ -706,11 +712,42 @@ static u32 pmic_arb_offset_v1(struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa, u8 sid, u16 addr)
> return 0x800 + 0x80 * pa->channel;
> }
>
> +static u16 pmic_arb_find_chan(struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa, u16 ppid)
> +{
> + u32 regval;
> + u16 chan;
> + u16 id;
> +
> + /*
> + * PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL is a table in HW mapping channel to ppid.
> + * ppid_to_chan is an in-memory invert of that table.
> + */
> + for (chan = pa->last_channel; ; chan++) {
> + regval = readl_relaxed(pa->core + PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL(chan));
> + if (!regval)
> + continue;
> +
> + id = (regval >> 8) & PMIC_ARB_PPID_MASK;
> + pa->ppid_to_chan[id] = chan | PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID;
> + if (id == ppid)
> + break;
> + }
> + pa->last_channel = chan;
> +
> + return chan;
> +}
> +
> +
> /* v2 offset per ppid (chan) and per ee */
> static u32 pmic_arb_offset_v2(struct spmi_pmic_arb_dev *pa, u8 sid, u16 addr)
> {
> u16 ppid = (sid << 8) | (addr >> 8);
> - u8 chan = pa->ppid_to_chan[ppid];
> + u16 chan;
> +
> + chan = pa->ppid_to_chan[ppid];
> + if (!(chan & PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID))
> + chan = pmic_arb_find_chan(pa, ppid);
> + chan &= ~PMIC_ARB_CHAN_VALID;
>
> return 0x1000 * pa->ee + 0x8000 * chan;
> }
> @@ -797,7 +834,7 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *res;
> void __iomem *core;
> u32 channel, ee, hw_ver;
> - int err, i;
> + int err;
> bool is_v1;
>
> ctrl = spmi_controller_alloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pa));
> @@ -825,10 +862,7 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> pa->wr_base = core;
> pa->rd_base = core;
> } else {
> - u8 chan;
> - u16 ppid;
> - u32 regval;
> -
> + pa->core = core;
> pa->ver_ops = &pmic_arb_v2;
>
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
> @@ -847,24 +881,14 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> goto err_put_ctrl;
> }
>
> - pa->ppid_to_chan = devm_kzalloc(&ctrl->dev,
> - PPID_TO_CHAN_TABLE_SZ, GFP_KERNEL);
> + pa->ppid_to_chan = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev,
> + PMIC_ARB_MAX_PPID,
> + sizeof(*pa->ppid_to_chan),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pa->ppid_to_chan) {
> err = -ENOMEM;
> goto err_put_ctrl;
> }
> - /*
> - * PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL is a table in HW mapping channel to ppid.
> - * ppid_to_chan is an in-memory invert of that table.
> - */
> - for (chan = 0; chan < PMIC_ARB_MAX_CHNL; ++chan) {
> - regval = readl_relaxed(core + PMIC_ARB_REG_CHNL(chan));
> - if (!regval)
> - continue;
> -
> - ppid = (regval >> 8) & 0xFFF;
> - pa->ppid_to_chan[ppid] = chan;
> - }
> }
>
> res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "intr");
> @@ -915,9 +939,20 @@ static int spmi_pmic_arb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> pa->ee = ee;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pa->mapping_table); ++i)
> - pa->mapping_table[i] = readl_relaxed(
> - pa->cnfg + SPMI_MAPPING_TABLE_REG(i));
> + pa->apid_to_ppid = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS,
> + sizeof(*pa->apid_to_ppid),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pa->apid_to_ppid) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_put_ctrl;
> + }
> +
> + pa->mapping_table = devm_kcalloc(&ctrl->dev, PMIC_ARB_MAX_PERIPHS - 1,
> + sizeof(*pa->mapping_table), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!pa->mapping_table) {
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err_put_ctrl;
> + }
>
> /* Initialize max_apid/min_apid to the opposite bounds, during
> * the irq domain translation, we are sure to update these */
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] spmi-pmic-arb: support configurable number of peripherals
2015-09-15 1:28 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2015-09-15 11:20 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-09-15 18:27 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ivan T. Ivanov @ 2015-09-15 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 18:28 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 09/14/2015 02:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > The current driver implementation supports only 128 peripherals.
> > Add support for more than 128 peripherals by taking a lazy
> > caching approach to the mapping tables. Instead of reading the
> > tables at boot given some fixed size, read them on an as needed
> > basis and cache the results. We still assume a max number of 512
> > peripherals, trading off some space for simplicity.
> >
> > Based on a patch by Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org> and
> > Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
>
> Hi Ivan,
>
> This patch causes 8916 to crash, because there isn't a mapping for ppid
> 257 in the ppid to channel table. It seems that we're reading the revid
> from the slave id 1 pmic by going through channel 0, which seems to be
> setup for ppid 9 (slave id 0 and the peripheral starting at 0x900). Can
> we stop reading the revid registers from non-zero slave id pmic devices?
> That would be one solution to fix this problem. Or maybe we need to
> special case this in the pmic arbiter code to fold ppid 0xN01 (slave id
> N and address 0x100) onto channel 0 all the time?
>
Yes, we can. We are not using this information at the moment.
Right now, revision read is more or less for debug purposes.
Would following patch work for you? Of course it will be difficult
to guaranties that some other driver misbehave and touch non-existing
register, right?
Regards,
Ivan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-mfd-qcom-spmi-pmic-Do-not-access-non-existing-regist.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1392 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150915/40e07889/attachment.bin>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] spmi-pmic-arb: support configurable number of peripherals
2015-09-15 11:20 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
@ 2015-09-15 18:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-14 22:43 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2015-09-15 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 09/15, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 18:28 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 09/14/2015 02:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > The current driver implementation supports only 128 peripherals.
> > > Add support for more than 128 peripherals by taking a lazy
> > > caching approach to the mapping tables. Instead of reading the
> > > tables at boot given some fixed size, read them on an as needed
> > > basis and cache the results. We still assume a max number of 512
> > > peripherals, trading off some space for simplicity.
> > >
> > > Based on a patch by Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org> and
> > > Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > ---
> >
> > Hi Ivan,
> >
> > This patch causes 8916 to crash, because there isn't a mapping for ppid
> > 257 in the ppid to channel table. It seems that we're reading the revid
> > from the slave id 1 pmic by going through channel 0, which seems to be
> > setup for ppid 9 (slave id 0 and the peripheral starting at 0x900). Can
> > we stop reading the revid registers from non-zero slave id pmic devices?
> > That would be one solution to fix this problem. Or maybe we need to
> > special case this in the pmic arbiter code to fold ppid 0xN01 (slave id
> > N and address 0x100) onto channel 0 all the time?
> >
>
> Yes, we can. We are not using this information at the moment.
> Right now, revision read is more or less for debug purposes.
>
> Would following patch work for you? Of course it will be difficult
Yes the patch works fine. Feel free to add a
Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> to guaranties that some other driver misbehave and touch non-existing
> register, right?
Yeah some driver could misbehave and try to read/write something
that doesn't exist. As in this case, the device will reset. Given
that all this stuff is in the kernel though, it seems fine to
blow up instead of add a bunch of checks that aren't ever going
to matter in practice.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] spmi-pmic-arb: support configurable number of peripherals
2015-09-15 18:27 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2015-10-14 22:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-15 9:23 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2015-10-14 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 09/15/2015 11:27 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 09/15, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 18:28 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 09/14/2015 02:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> The current driver implementation supports only 128 peripherals.
>>>> Add support for more than 128 peripherals by taking a lazy
>>>> caching approach to the mapping tables. Instead of reading the
>>>> tables at boot given some fixed size, read them on an as needed
>>>> basis and cache the results. We still assume a max number of 512
>>>> peripherals, trading off some space for simplicity.
>>>>
>>>> Based on a patch by Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org> and
>>>> Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>>> ---
>>> Hi Ivan,
>>>
>>> This patch causes 8916 to crash, because there isn't a mapping for ppid
>>> 257 in the ppid to channel table. It seems that we're reading the revid
>>> from the slave id 1 pmic by going through channel 0, which seems to be
>>> setup for ppid 9 (slave id 0 and the peripheral starting at 0x900). Can
>>> we stop reading the revid registers from non-zero slave id pmic devices?
>>> That would be one solution to fix this problem. Or maybe we need to
>>> special case this in the pmic arbiter code to fold ppid 0xN01 (slave id
>>> N and address 0x100) onto channel 0 all the time?
>>>
>> Yes, we can. We are not using this information at the moment.
>> Right now, revision read is more or less for debug purposes.
>>
>> Would following patch work for you? Of course it will be difficult
> Yes the patch works fine. Feel free to add a
>
> Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>
>
I have to take this back. I missed the part where some pmics are on
slave id 2 or slave id 4, so this check isn't going to work. I've
adjusted it to use sid % 2 instead and I'll resend these two patches,
but I imagine to be more robust we're going to need to add a revid node
to the DT under the SID that actually has it. Then we can search the
child nodes for a revid compatible node and do the rev probing stuff.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] spmi-pmic-arb: support configurable number of peripherals
2015-10-14 22:43 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2015-10-15 9:23 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-10-15 18:24 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ivan T. Ivanov @ 2015-10-15 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
> On Oct 15, 2015, at 1:43 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On 09/15/2015 11:27 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 09/15, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2015-09-14 at 18:28 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>> On 09/14/2015 02:54 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>> The current driver implementation supports only 128 peripherals.
>>>>> Add support for more than 128 peripherals by taking a lazy
>>>>> caching approach to the mapping tables. Instead of reading the
>>>>> tables at boot given some fixed size, read them on an as needed
>>>>> basis and cache the results. We still assume a max number of 512
>>>>> peripherals, trading off some space for simplicity.
>>>>>
>>>>> Based on a patch by Gilad Avidov <gavidov@codeaurora.org> and
>>>>> Sagar Dharia <sdharia@codeaurora.org>.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>> Hi Ivan,
>>>>
>>>> This patch causes 8916 to crash, because there isn't a mapping for ppid
>>>> 257 in the ppid to channel table. It seems that we're reading the revid
>>>> from the slave id 1 pmic by going through channel 0, which seems to be
>>>> setup for ppid 9 (slave id 0 and the peripheral starting at 0x900). Can
>>>> we stop reading the revid registers from non-zero slave id pmic devices?
>>>> That would be one solution to fix this problem. Or maybe we need to
>>>> special case this in the pmic arbiter code to fold ppid 0xN01 (slave id
>>>> N and address 0x100) onto channel 0 all the time?
>>>>
>>> Yes, we can. We are not using this information at the moment.
>>> Right now, revision read is more or less for debug purposes.
>>>
>>> Would following patch work for you? Of course it will be difficult
>> Yes the patch works fine. Feel free to add a
>>
>> Tested-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
>>
>>
>
> I have to take this back. I missed the part where some pmics are on
> slave id 2 or slave id 4, so this check isn't going to work. I've
> adjusted it to use sid % 2 instead and I'll resend these two patches,
> but I imagine to be more robust we're going to need to add a revid node
> to the DT under the SID that actually has it. Then we can search the
> child nodes for a revid compatible node and do the rev probing stuff.
Ah, yes. We don?t use revision information for now.
I suppose we can just remove these reads until we need
this information?
Regards,
Ivan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] spmi-pmic-arb: support configurable number of peripherals
2015-10-15 9:23 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
@ 2015-10-15 18:24 ` Stephen Boyd
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2015-10-15 18:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 10/15, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>
> > On Oct 15, 2015, at 1:43 AM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >
> > I have to take this back. I missed the part where some pmics are on
> > slave id 2 or slave id 4, so this check isn't going to work. I've
> > adjusted it to use sid % 2 instead and I'll resend these two patches,
> > but I imagine to be more robust we're going to need to add a revid node
> > to the DT under the SID that actually has it. Then we can search the
> > child nodes for a revid compatible node and do the rev probing stuff.
>
> Ah, yes. We don?t use revision information for now.
> I suppose we can just remove these reads until we need
> this information?
>
True, we could just remove all the code and make it look for a
revid node at some later time. But later would be soon because
I'm working on patches to add the read/write/volatile regmap
tables to this driver. I guess I'll just go all the way and do
the revid node part.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-15 18:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-14 21:54 [PATCH] spmi-pmic-arb: support configurable number of peripherals Stephen Boyd
2015-09-15 1:28 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-09-15 11:20 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-09-15 18:27 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-14 22:43 ` Stephen Boyd
2015-10-15 9:23 ` Ivan T. Ivanov
2015-10-15 18:24 ` Stephen Boyd
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).