From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: brcmstb: Add Bus Interface Unit control setup
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:42:18 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FAFB7A.4010105@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADtm3G6SkczVkFK0n=fpMCkocj_ijGWtHkfipTZZfp8deC=6zg@mail.gmail.com>
On 16/09/15 23:08, Gregory Fong wrote:
>> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/brcmstb/biuctrl.c b/drivers/soc/brcmstb/biuctrl.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..1d4deada1c4d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/soc/brcmstb/biuctrl.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,119 @@
>> [...]
>> +int __init brcmstb_biuctrl_init(void)
>> +{
>> + int ret = 0;
>> +
>> + ret = setup_hifcpubiuctrl_regs();
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + ret = mcp_write_pairing_set();
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pr_err("MCP: Unable to disable write pairing!\n");
>> + return ret;
>
> The return value isn't used in patch 3. Is there a point to returning
> an error from this function in either of the above two locations,
> considering that?
>
> Looks good otherwise.
>
> Acked-by: Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>
Not really, how about this:
void __init brcmstb_biuctrl_init(void)
{
int ret;
setup_hifcpubiuctrl_regs();
ret = mcp_write_pairing_set();
if (ret) {
pr_err("MCP: Unable to disable write pairing!\n");
return;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
register_syscore_ops(&brcmstb_cpu_credit_syscore_ops);
#endif
}
and updating the function prototype accordingly in the header file?
--
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-17 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-15 18:14 [PATCH v2 0/3] ARM: brcmstb: Bus Interface Unit support Florian Fainelli
2015-09-15 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] Documentation: bindings: brcmstb: Document write-pairing Florian Fainelli
2015-09-17 6:09 ` Gregory Fong
2015-09-17 17:28 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-09-15 18:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] soc: brcmstb: Add Bus Interface Unit control setup Florian Fainelli
2015-09-17 6:08 ` Gregory Fong
2015-09-17 17:42 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2015-09-18 13:12 ` Gregory Fong
2015-09-18 19:22 ` Florian Fainelli
2015-09-15 18:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] ARM: brcmstb: Setup BIU control registers during boot Florian Fainelli
2015-09-17 6:10 ` Gregory Fong
2015-09-18 19:23 ` Florian Fainelli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FAFB7A.4010105@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).