From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: yangyingliang@huawei.com (Yang Yingliang) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:13:01 +0800 Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] genirq: add move_irqs() for cpu hotplug In-Reply-To: <20150917220944.GX21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1442467166-1460-1-git-send-email-yangyingliang@huawei.com> <1442467166-1460-3-git-send-email-yangyingliang@huawei.com> <55FAEDF6.6060000@arm.com> <20150917220944.GX21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: <55FB651D.5080101@huawei.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2015/9/18 6:09, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:04:06AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote: >>> I don't think having this prototype guarded by this #if is very useful. >>> You can probably leave it standalone. >> >> Yes, there is no point if the function name is unique. Though >> move_irqs() is rather undescriptive. irq_break_affinities() might >> describe it quite well, but feel free to come up with soemthing better. > > I don't think "irq_break_affinities" is anywhere near a good name - it's > not about always breaking affinities (moving an IRQ off one CPU onto > another within the current affinity setting does not break the affinity.) > > irq_migrate_all() > > irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu() > > irq_this_cpu_hotunplug() > > irq_cpu_hotunplug() > irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu() describe it well, I will choose it. Thanks, Yang