From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: maxime.coquelin@st.com (Maxime Coquelin)
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:31:26 +0200
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] ST PLL fixes for 4.3-rc2
In-Reply-To: <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org>
References: <1442389379-9298-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@linaro.org>
 <20150916223051.GO23081@codeaurora.org> <55FA8C14.3020000@st.com>
 <20150917181449.GR23081@codeaurora.org>
Message-ID: <55FBBDCE.8070905@st.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org



On 09/17/2015 08:14 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 09/17, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>> On 09/17/2015 12:30 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 09/16, Gabriel Fernandez wrote:
>>>> This patch set fixes a kernel crash :
>>> [..]
>>>> This kernel crash is due to a broken compatibility with this commit:
>>>> commit 5eb26c605909 ("ARM: STi: DT: Rename st_pll3200c32_407_c0_x into st_pll3200c32_cx_x")
>>> It isn't clear who's supposed to apply this because the To: list
>>> is huge. Did you want to take this through arm-soc? If so, feel
>>> free to take my acked-by on the second patch. The first patch
>>> doesn't even apply to clk tree because the patch introducing the
>>> typo didn't go through our tree.
>> Indeed Stephen, I see it went through my tree (STi DT).
>> So the first patch should be taken through arm-soc.
>> The second patch, should be taken through yours I think.
>>
> Ok. That probably breaks bisectability, but if you're not
> worried, I'm not worried.
I'm not worried about bisectability indeed, as the first patch is just 
typo fixes in DT Bindings documentation.

Regards,
Maxime