From: daniel.thompson@linaro.org (Daniel Thompson)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Pseudo-NMI for arm64 using ICC_PMR_EL1 (GICv3)
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:23:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <55FBF42B.2090806@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32CDD1A8-EF10-4F6B-86B6-64981874361A@jonmasters.org>
On 18/09/15 06:11, Jon Masters wrote:
>> On Sep 14, 2015, at 06:26, Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org> wrote:
>> This patchset provides a pseudo-NMI for arm64 kernels by reimplementing
>> the irqflags macros to modify the GIC PMR (the priority mask register is
>> accessible as a system register on GICv3 and later) rather than the
>> PSR. The patchset includes an implementation of
>> arch_trigger_all_cpu_backtrace() for arm64 allowing the new code to be
>> exercised.
>
> I think there is a need to connect a few dots on this next week
> during Connect. Some other conversations have discussed alternative
> implementations elsewhere. I will assist.
Fine by me.
I'd be very happy to talk about alternative approaches. In the past I've
had long conversations about trapping to ARM TF as a means to simulate
NMI. I haven't written any code to move in this direction but I still
think of it as being the future-areas-of-interest pile.
That said, whenever I search for (what I think are) sensible keywords
for this subject I generally only find my own work! I may be selecting a
rather blinkered set of keywords when I search but nevertheless it does
mean I will probably have to rely on you to make introductions!
Daniel.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-18 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-14 13:26 [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Pseudo-NMI for arm64 using ICC_PMR_EL1 (GICv3) Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/7] irqchip: gic-v3: Reset BPR during initialization Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/7] arm64: Add support for on-demand backtrace of other CPUs Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] arm64: alternative: Apply alternatives early in boot process Daniel Thompson
2015-09-16 13:05 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-16 15:51 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-09-16 16:24 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-17 13:25 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-09-17 14:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-17 15:28 ` Daniel Thompson
2015-09-17 15:43 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: irqflags: Reorder the fiq & async macros Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: irqflags: Use ICC sysregs to implement IRQ masking Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] arm64: Implement IPI_CPU_BACKTRACE using pseudo-NMIs Daniel Thompson
2015-09-14 13:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: irqflags: Automatically identify I bit mis-management Daniel Thompson
2015-09-18 5:11 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/7] Pseudo-NMI for arm64 using ICC_PMR_EL1 (GICv3) Jon Masters
2015-09-18 11:23 ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
2015-09-22 18:08 ` 答复: " Dingtianhong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=55FBF42B.2090806@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).