From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrzej.p@samsung.com (Andrzej Pietrasiewicz) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 11:59:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] ARM64: dts: exynos5433: add jpeg node In-Reply-To: <55FFD2D2.1010508@xs4all.nl> References: <1442586060-23657-1-git-send-email-andrzej.p@samsung.com> <1442586060-23657-5-git-send-email-andrzej.p@samsung.com> <55FFD2D2.1010508@xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <55FFD4FF.6090306@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Hans, W dniu 21.09.2015 o 11:50, Hans Verkuil pisze: > On 18-09-15 16:21, Andrzej Pietrasiewicz wrote: >> From: Marek Szyprowski >> >> Add Exynos 5433 jpeg h/w codec node. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski >> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynos5433.dtsi > > This dtsi file doesn't exist in the media-git tree. What is the story here? > > Should this go through a different subsystem? > > I think the media subsystem can take patches 1-3 and whoever does DT patches can > take this patch, right? > The cover letter explains that the series is rebased onto Mauro's master with Kukjin's branch merged. The latter does contain the exynos5433.dtsi. That said, yes, taking patches 1-3 in media subsystem and leaving DT patch to someone else is the way to go. Andrzej