From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K. Poulose)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64: relax Image placement rules
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:44:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5605095A.10707@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu-WGSaGA+4OJcNOct+sdBHsO8yKOc50t3jmB86xonWQ=g@mail.gmail.com>
On 25/09/15 00:19, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 24 September 2015 at 09:38, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 24 September 2015 at 09:37, Suzuki K. Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> wrote:
>>> On 23/09/15 01:37, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>>
>>> Ard,
>>>
>>> I gave your series a quick run and dumping the kernel page tables(with
>>> CONFIG_ARM64_PTDUMP)
>>> I find this problem :
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>> ---[ Kernel Mapping ]---
>>> 0xffffffbffc000000-0xffffffbffc600000 6M RW x SHD AF
>>> MEM/NORMAL *****
>>> 0xffffffbffc600000-0xffffffbffc7f5000 2004K RW x SHD AF UXN
>>> MEM/NORMAL
>>> 0xffffffbffc7f5000-0xffffffbffc875000 512K RW NX SHD AF UXN
>>> MEM/NORMAL
>>> 0xffffffbffc875000-0xffffffbffca00000 1580K RW x SHD AF UXN
>>> MEM/NORMAL
>>> ---[ Linear Mapping ]---
>>> 0xffffffc000000000-0xffffffc040000000 1G RW NX SHD AF UXN
>>> MEM/NORMAL
>>>
>>>
>>> Note that the first mapping in the kernel doesn't have UXN set, which is a
>>> regression.
>>> I haven't started digging into it yet, but I thought I will point it out
>>> here, in case you
>>> already fixed it.
>>>
>>
>> Ok, thanks for pointing that out. I will look into it.
>>
>
> Turns out that, since the kernel mapping is not overwritten by the
> linear mapping, it retains the original permissions assigned in
> head.S. So this is enough to fix it
>
> """
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> index 2df4a55f00d4..fcd250cff4bf 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/head.S
> @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@
> /*
> * Initial memory map attributes.
> */
> -#define PTE_FLAGS PTE_TYPE_PAGE | PTE_AF | PTE_SHARED
> -#define PMD_FLAGS PMD_TYPE_SECT | PMD_SECT_AF | PMD_SECT_S
> +#define PTE_FLAGS PTE_TYPE_PAGE | PTE_AF | PTE_SHARED | PTE_UXN
> +#define PMD_FLAGS PMD_TYPE_SECT | PMD_SECT_AF | PMD_SECT_S | PMD_SECT_UXN
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES
> #define MM_MMUFLAGS PTE_ATTRINDX(MT_NORMAL) | PTE_FLAGS
> """
>
Yes, that fixes it. With that I get :
---[ Kernel Mapping ]---
0xffffffbffc000000-0xffffffbffc600000 6M RW x SHD AF UXN MEM/NORMAL
0xffffffbffc600000-0xffffffbffc7f5000 2004K RW x SHD AF UXN MEM/NORMAL
0xffffffbffc7f5000-0xffffffbffc875000 512K RW NX SHD AF UXN MEM/NORMAL
0xffffffbffc875000-0xffffffbffca00000 1580K RW x SHD AF UXN MEM/NORMAL
---[ Linear Mapping ]---
0xffffffc000000000-0xffffffc080000000 2G RW NX SHD AF UXN MEM/NORMAL
0xffffffc800000000-0xffffffc880000000 2G RW NX SHD AF UXN MEM/NORMAL
>
>>> Note: I see that you have used CONFIG_ARM64_64K_PAGES to handle
>>> section/table mapping
>>> (which I have tried to cleanup in 16K page size series and which is not
>>> merged yet).
>>> We should be careful when we merge our patches, as we could miss such new
>>> cases.
>>>
>>
>> I was aware of this, and I think it makes sense to the 16 KB pages to
>> be merged first, and then I will rebase these patches on top of it.
>>
>
> Do you have a git tree with the latest version?
>
Yes, it is available here :
git://linux-arm.org/linux-skp.git 16k/v2-4.3-rc1
Thanks
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-25 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-23 0:37 [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64: relax Image placement rules Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-23 0:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] of/fdt: make memblock minimum physical address arch configurable Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-23 4:45 ` Mark Rutland
2015-09-23 22:59 ` Rob Herring
2015-09-23 0:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] arm64: use more granular reservations for static page table allocations Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-23 0:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] arm64: split off early mapping code from early_fixmap_init() Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-23 0:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: mm: explicitly bootstrap the linear mapping Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-23 0:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: move kernel mapping out of linear region Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-23 0:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] arm64: map linear region as non-executable Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-23 0:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] arm64: allow kernel Image to be loaded anywhere in physical memory Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-14 11:30 ` James Morse
2015-10-14 13:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-14 16:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-14 16:51 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-15 10:04 ` James Morse
2015-09-24 16:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] arm64: relax Image placement rules Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-09-24 16:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-24 23:19 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-09-25 8:44 ` Suzuki K. Poulose [this message]
2015-09-25 21:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-13 17:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-13 17:14 ` Ard Biesheuvel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5605095A.10707@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).