From: tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com (Tirumalesh Chalamarla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Increase the max granular size
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:31:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <560576EB.2010208@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150925144516.GM1820@rric.localdomain>
On 09/25/2015 07:45 AM, Robert Richter wrote:
> Will,
>
> On 22.09.15 19:29:02, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:59:48PM +0100, Robert Richter wrote:
>>> From: Tirumalesh Chalamarla <tchalamarla@cavium.com>
>>>
>>> Increase the standard cacheline size to avoid having locks in the same
>>> cacheline.
>>>
>>> Cavium's ThunderX core implements cache lines of 128 byte size. With
>>> current granulare size of 64 bytes (L1_CACHE_SHIFT=6) two locks could
>>> share the same cache line leading a performance degradation.
>>> Increasing the size fixes that.
>> Do you have an example of that happening?
> I did some 'poor man's kernel build all modules benchmarking' and
> could not find significant performance improvements so far (second
> part with the patch reverted):
>
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01404-g5818d6e89783.log:real 7m10.490s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01404-g5818d6e89783.log:real 6m59.747s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01404-g5818d6e89783.log:real 6m59.264s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01404-g5818d6e89783.log:real 7m0.435s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01404-g5818d6e89783.log:real 6m59.569s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01404-g5818d6e89783.log:real 6m59.274s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01404-g5818d6e89783.log:real 7m0.507s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01404-g5818d6e89783.log:real 7m1.551s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01404-g5818d6e89783.log:real 6m59.073s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01404-g5818d6e89783.log:real 7m1.738s
>
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01406-g638c69fddc40.log:real 7m10.644s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01406-g638c69fddc40.log:real 6m59.814s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01406-g638c69fddc40.log:real 7m0.315s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01406-g638c69fddc40.log:real 6m59.610s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01406-g638c69fddc40.log:real 6m59.885s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01406-g638c69fddc40.log:real 6m59.281s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01406-g638c69fddc40.log:real 7m0.869s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01406-g638c69fddc40.log:real 7m0.953s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01406-g638c69fddc40.log:real 7m0.787s
> build-allmodules-4.2.0-01406-g638c69fddc40.log:real 7m0.656s
>
> I will check what kind of workloads this patch was written for.
> Tirumalesh, any idea?
mainly for workloads where compiler optimizes based on cache line size,
let me write a small bench mark
> Thanks,
>
> -Robert
>
>>> Increasing the size has no negative impact to cache invalidation on
>>> systems with a smaller cache line. There is an impact on memory usage,
>>> but that's not too important for arm64 use cases.
>> Do you have any before/after numbers to show the impact of this change
>> on other supported SoCs?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-25 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-22 17:59 [PATCH] arm64: Increase the max granular size Robert Richter
2015-09-22 18:29 ` Will Deacon
2015-09-25 14:45 ` Robert Richter
2015-09-25 16:31 ` Tirumalesh Chalamarla [this message]
2015-10-10 17:39 ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-12 9:16 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-16 19:57 ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-28 19:09 ` Catalin Marinas
[not found] ` <CAMuHMdWQygbxMXoOsbwek6DzZcr7J-C23VCK4ubbgUr+zj=giw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-11-03 12:05 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 14:38 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 14:55 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-11-03 18:50 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-03 23:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 12:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 13:53 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 14:54 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-04 15:28 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-04 15:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 4:31 ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05 11:50 ` [PATCH] mm: slab: Only move management objects off-slab for sizes larger than KMALLOC_MIN_SIZE Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 13:31 ` Andrew Morton
2015-11-05 16:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-06 13:00 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2015-11-05 17:39 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-11-05 4:40 ` [PATCH] arm64: Increase the max granular size Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05 10:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-05 11:45 ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-05 12:17 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-09 7:41 ` Joonsoo Kim
2015-11-09 18:36 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-10 0:19 ` Joonsoo Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=560576EB.2010208@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=tchalamarla@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).