From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: david.vrabel@citrix.com (David Vrabel)
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 17:36:06 +0100
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/20] xen/arm64: Add support for 64KB
 page in Linux
In-Reply-To: <560ABD4C.2020004@citrix.com>
References: <1441640038-23615-1-git-send-email-julien.grall@citrix.com>
 <560ABBFA.6070902@citrix.com> <560ABD4C.2020004@citrix.com>
Message-ID: <560ABDF6.1090804@citrix.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 29/09/15 17:33, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On 29/09/15 17:27, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 07/09/15 16:33, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> A branch based on the latest xentip/for-linus-4.3 can be found here:
>>>
>>> git://xenbits.xen.org/people/julieng/linux-arm.git branch xen-64k-v4
>>
>> This has too many conflicts with the
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git for-linus-4.4
>> branch.
>>
>> Please rebase.
> 
> I was about to send a new version rebased (no changes in it so far
> except for rebasing purpose). I will do it on top of for-linus-4.4.
> I will also include the swiotlb changes at the end as it was reviewed by
> Stefano.

Thanks.

> BTW, some of the patches should, strictly speaking, go via the block and
> network subsystem. Although, they heavily depends on other patches in
> this series. Would it be fine to send all through xentip?

Yes, if they've been acked by the appropriate maintainer.

David