From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: stefan.wahren@i2se.com (Stefan Wahren) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 08:47:15 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: bcm2835: add label for uart0 In-Reply-To: <561482CE.2020804@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1443810675-25558-1-git-send-email-stefan.wahren@i2se.com> <87oagbhdfb.fsf@eliezer.anholt.net> <561482CE.2020804@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <5614BFF3.9010708@i2se.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Am 07.10.2015 um 04:26 schrieb Stephen Warren: > On 10/06/2015 03:53 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: >> Stefan Wahren writes: >> >>> This patch adds a label for uart0 to allow changing of uart0 >>> pins. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Wahren >> This patch seems innocuous, but could you clarify for me how >> exactly you change the uart0 pins, and why one would do that? > I /assume/ this is so that some other DT file (that includes the > edited file) can add some pinctrl-related properties to this DT node, > using syntax such as: > > &uart0 { > new content; > }; > > If so, the patch, > Acked-by: Stephen Warren Your assumption is correct. In case the UART should be used on a custom board with Raspberry Pi Compute Module and a microcontroller this change is necessary to reference the UART: &gpio { // ... uart0_pins: uart0_pins { brcm,pins = <36 37>; brcm,function = ; }; } &uart0 { pinctrl-names = "default"; pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_pins>; status = "okay"; }; Thanks Stefan