From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rogerq@ti.com (Roger Quadros) Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 14:07:45 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] memory: omap-gpmc: expand the description of the debug facility In-Reply-To: <20151007110231.GL3982@pengutronix.de> References: <1444162070-22034-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <1444162070-22034-2-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <5614CDAE.6070604@ti.com> <20151007075338.GH3982@pengutronix.de> <20151007102822.GT23801@atomide.com> <20151007110231.GL3982@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <5614FD01.6090009@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/10/15 14:02, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote: > Hello Tony, > > On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 03:41:19AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: >> * Uwe Kleine-K?nig [151007 00:57]: >>> On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 10:45:50AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote: >>>> >>>> How about this instead? >>>> >>>> NOTE: Apart from matching the register setup with the bootloader you also need to >>>> match the GPMC FCLK frequency used by the bootloader else the GPMC timings >>>> won't be identical with the bootloader timings. >>> Yeah, sounds better, thanks. >>> >>>> Also you might need to build this patch on top of >>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2054796 >>> I talked to Tony about this patch yesterday on irc, but I didn't find it >>> in the archives yet when I sent my mail. >> >> Yes sorry here's a repost with your and Roger's changes folded in and >> edited a bit. Probably best to keep them together with this patch. >> >> Does the following look OK to you guys? > Yes, > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig Looks good to me too. cheers, -roger