From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com (Sergei Shtylyov) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 14:05:17 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v4 3/3] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add nor flash node In-Reply-To: References: <1444729160-26433-1-git-send-email-bayi.cheng@mediatek.com> <1444729160-26433-4-git-send-email-bayi.cheng@mediatek.com> <561D1642.3070105@cogentembedded.com> Message-ID: <561E36ED.7090103@cogentembedded.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello. On 10/14/2015 4:07 AM, Daniel Kurtz wrote: >>> Add Mediatek nor flash node >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bayi Cheng >>> --- >>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi | 15 +++++++++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi >>> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi >>> index d18ee42..385c2e4 100644 >>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi >>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173.dtsi >>> @@ -365,6 +365,21 @@ >>> status = "disabled"; >>> }; >>> >>> + nor_flash: spi at 1100d000 { >> >> I don't think this is a good label name for a SPI controller. > > You think "spi" is not a good name for SPI controller? > Or you mean the label "nor_flash"? I think I said clearly: "label". :-) > Would you prefer: > > spi_nor_flash: spi at 1100d000 I'd prefer the "_nor_flash" part to be dropped, to be used for the real flash device (if needed) which is a sub-node of this node. [...] > -Dan MBR, Sergei