From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vigneshr@ti.com (Vignesh R) Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:07:40 +0530 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: dts: am437x-gp-evm: Add wakeup interrupt source for pixcir_i2c_ts In-Reply-To: <561E36BB.7000309@ti.com> References: <1444801956-17817-1-git-send-email-vigneshr@ti.com> <561E165B.3000907@ti.com> <561E1C89.9080508@ti.com> <561E36BB.7000309@ti.com> Message-ID: <561E3E84.2000308@ti.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 10/14/2015 04:34 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: > Vignesh, > > On 14/10/15 12:12, Vignesh R wrote: >> >> >> On 10/14/2015 02:16 PM, Roger Quadros wrote: >> >>> >>> On 14/10/15 08:52, Vignesh R wrote: >>>> On am437x-gp-evm, pixcir_i2c_ts can wakeup the system from lower power >>>> state via pinctrl and IO daisy chain using generic wakeirq framework. >>>> With commit 3fffd1283927 ("i2c: allow specifying separate wakeup >>>> interrupt in device tree") i2c core allows optional wakeirq to be >>>> specified via device tree. Add wakeup irq entry to enable pixcir_i2c_ts >>>> to wake the system from low power state. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-gp-evm.dts | 5 +++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-gp-evm.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-gp-evm.dts >>>> index 22038f21f228..69e93af7df0d 100644 >>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-gp-evm.dts >>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am437x-gp-evm.dts >>>> @@ -581,8 +581,13 @@ >>>> >>>> attb-gpio = <&gpio3 22 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; >>>> >>>> + interrupts-extended = <&gpio3 22 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>, >>>> + <&am43xx_pinmux 0x264>; >>> >>> How does this work? >>> >>> interrupts-extended property must have >>> 1) interrupt parent >>> 2) interrupt number >>> 3) interrupt flags >>> >>> Your change doesn't seem to comply with those requirements. >> >> AFAIU, interrupts-extended has two parts: interrupt parent phandle and >> interrupt specifier. >> The number of cells in interrupt specifier is determined by >> interrupt-cells property of interrupt parent node. > > Got it. > >> In above case, gpio3 has interrupt-cells = 2 hence interrupt specifier >> has interrupt number and interrupt flag field. > > But is GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH an interrupt flag? Oops.. I will change it to IRQ_TYPE_NONE as represented in interrupts property. > >> But in case am43xx_pinmux node, interrupt-cells is 1 hence has no >> interrupt flag field. >> > Understood, thanks. Might be worth adding a comment as to what 0x264 means though. > Will add a one line comment indicating its the offset of gpio3_22 padconf register from am43xx_pinmux base. > cheers, > -roger > -- Regards Vignesh