From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: hauke@hauke-m.de (Hauke Mehrtens)
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:52:31 +0200
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: Add new boards to bcm4708 DT bindings
In-Reply-To: <1444860890-28649-2-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com>
References: <1444860890-28649-1-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com>
 <1444860890-28649-2-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com>
Message-ID: <5620120F.3060109@hauke-m.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 10/15/2015 12:14 AM, Jon Mason wrote:
> Add the 4708, 4709, and 953012k SVKs to the the documentation for the
> Broadcom Northstar device tree bindings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jonmason@broadcom.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt
> index 6b0f49f..b9cc308 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/bcm/brcm,bcm4708.txt
> @@ -5,4 +5,11 @@ Boards with the BCM4708 SoC shall have the following properties:
>  
>  Required root node property:
>  
> +bcm94708

I thought we wanted to add the SoC names here, isn't bcm94708 a board
the bcm4708, the SoC ion this board? I do not really care about this
file, has anyone found the documentation what should be listed here?

Hauke

>  compatible = "brcm,bcm4708";
> +
> +bcm94709
> +compatible = "brcm,bcm4709";
> +
> +bcm953012
> +compatible = "brcm,bcm53012";
>