From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: javier@osg.samsung.com (Javier Martinez Canillas)
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 14:06:17 +0200
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ARM: exynos_defconfig: Increase
 CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE to 64K
In-Reply-To: <20151019115150.GY32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1445251715-9725-1-git-send-email-alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
 <5624D87D.4090901@osg.samsung.com>
 <20151019115150.GY32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <5624DCB9.4000903@osg.samsung.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hello Russell,

On 10/19/2015 01:51 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 01:48:13PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>> Hello Alim,
>>
>> On 10/19/2015 12:48 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE is currently set to 8K, which is a bit on the
>>> smaller side, lets bump it up to 64K so that a bigger RAM_DISK can
>>> be used with defconfig.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
>>> ---
>>
>> I agree that 8KiB is too small and that should be bumped, I'm also
>> not sure what the best size would be but 64KiB sounds reasonable
>> to me. So for this patch:
> 
> It's _not_ 8KiB or 64KiB.
> 
> config BLK_DEV_RAM_SIZE
>         int "Default RAM disk size (kbytes)"
> 
> It's 8MiB or 64MiB - the value you place here is in units of 1024 bytes.
> 

Err, right. I got confused by the patch's commit message, sorry about
that and thanks for the clarification.

Best regards,
-- 
Javier Martinez Canillas
Open Source Group
Samsung Research America