linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jenskuske@gmail.com (Jens Kuske)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2015 09:49:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <562894FE.3040702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5627E515.6050505@redhat.com>

Hi,

On 21/10/15 21:18, Hans de Goede wrote:
> 
> Great to see that you've started working on this again. Last weekend I
> ended up working on this too together with Reinder E.N. de Haan <reinder@mveas.com>
> (added to the Cc).
> 
> We took a slightly different approach for the gates clocks, see:
> 
> https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commits/sunxi-wip
> 
> And specifically:
> 
> https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/80a1afe319d5d1a0c426d42e75d37f0c64e8ea0b
> 
> Combined with:
> 
> https://github.com/jwrdegoede/linux-sunxi/commit/d508da5feb5048f6674d6b24b58ac9058fb9d877
> 
> This deals with the per gate parents the same way the rockchip
> clock code does, and it seems to be quite a bit less code then your solution.
> 
> So now we've two solutions to chose from :) Since you seem to be back to
> working on this I'll refrain from doing any further work, at least
> without coordinating. Maxime, can you let us know which solution for the
> gates clock parents is best, or tell us if you think both solutions are
> no good :)

I'd actually prefer your solution. I duplicated the simple-gates code
when trying a different approach and never revisited that decision.

> 
> (I wanted to get in touch with you about the work done this weekend,
> but your posting of this v3 has sorta pre-empted that).
> 
> Other then the slightly different solution for the gates, the code in my tree
> is a straight forward port of your v2.
> 
> Thanks for your work on this!
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Hans
> 
> 
> p.s.
> 
> I'm teaching a kernel driver course at my local hackerspace in the netherlands:
> 
> https://revspace.nl/KernelDriverProgrammingCourse2015
> 
> Which is where our work on this this weekend originated. The next planned
> course day is November 1st and I expect Reinder to be working on the H3
> again then. I think the plan was to tackle USB next. Reinder can you confirm
> this ?  If you (Jens) want to work on USB before then, that is fine, but please
> coordinate their is plenty to do, so no need for us to be doing (more) double
> work.
> 

I don't plan to work on USB soon, my next step would have been Ethernet
and finishing the basic u-boot support. You know my u-boot H3 wip tree I
hope? Before we duplicate our work there too...
https://github.com/jemk/u-boot-sunxi/tree/sunxi/h3

Jens

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-22  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-21 16:13 [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support Jens Kuske
2015-10-21 16:13 ` [PATCH 1/6] clk: sunxi: Let divs clocks read the base factor clock name from devicetree Jens Kuske
2015-10-21 16:13 ` [PATCH 2/6] clk: sunxi: Add H3 clocks support Jens Kuske
2015-10-22  0:15   ` [linux-sunxi] " Julian Calaby
2015-10-22  7:32     ` Jens Kuske
2015-10-21 19:18 ` [PATCH 0/6] ARM: sunxi: Introduce Allwinner H3 support Hans de Goede
2015-10-22  7:49   ` Jens Kuske [this message]
2015-10-22  8:49     ` [linux-sunxi] " Hans de Goede
2015-10-27 19:24       ` Peter Korsgaard
2015-10-22  7:58   ` Jean-Francois Moine
2015-10-22  9:08     ` Hans de Goede
2015-10-21 19:23 ` Hans de Goede
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-06  9:31 Jens Kuske

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=562894FE.3040702@gmail.com \
    --to=jenskuske@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).