linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: eric.auger@linaro.org (Eric Auger)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC] vfio/type1: handle case where IOMMU does not support PAGE_SIZE size
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2015 18:17:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56310341.7010307@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151028171410.GK18966@arm.com>

Hi Will,
On 10/28/2015 06:14 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:27:28AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 13:12 +0000, Eric Auger wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>>> index 57d8c37..13fb974 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
>>> @@ -403,7 +403,7 @@ static void vfio_remove_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
>>>  static unsigned long vfio_pgsize_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>>>  {
>>>  	struct vfio_domain *domain;
>>> -	unsigned long bitmap = PAGE_MASK;
>>> +	unsigned long bitmap = ULONG_MAX;
>>
>> Isn't this and removing the WARN_ON()s the only real change in this
>> patch?  The rest looks like conversion to use IS_ALIGNED and the
>> following test, that I don't really understand...
>>
>>>  
>>>  	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>>>  	list_for_each_entry(domain, &iommu->domain_list, next)
>>> @@ -416,20 +416,18 @@ static unsigned long vfio_pgsize_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
>>>  static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>  			     struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap)
>>>  {
>>> -	uint64_t mask;
>>>  	struct vfio_dma *dma;
>>>  	size_t unmapped = 0;
>>>  	int ret = 0;
>>> +	unsigned int min_pagesz = __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
>>> +	unsigned int requested_alignment = (min_pagesz < PAGE_SIZE) ?
>>> +						PAGE_SIZE : min_pagesz;
>>
>> This one.  If we're going to support sub-PAGE_SIZE mappings, why do we
>> care to cap alignment at PAGE_SIZE?
> 
> Eric can clarify, but I think the intention here is to have VFIO continue
> doing things in PAGE_SIZE chunks precisely so that we don't have to rework
> all of the pinning code etc.
That's my intention indeed ;-)

Thanks

Eric
 The IOMMU API can then deal with the smaller
> page size.

> 
>>> -	mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu))) - 1;
>>> -
>>> -	if (unmap->iova & mask)
>>> +	if (!IS_ALIGNED(unmap->iova, requested_alignment))
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>> -	if (!unmap->size || unmap->size & mask)
>>> +	if (!unmap->size || !IS_ALIGNED(unmap->size, requested_alignment))
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>  
>>> -	WARN_ON(mask & PAGE_MASK);
>>> -
>>>  	mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>>>  
>>>  	/*
>>> @@ -553,25 +551,24 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>>>  	size_t size = map->size;
>>>  	long npage;
>>>  	int ret = 0, prot = 0;
>>> -	uint64_t mask;
>>>  	struct vfio_dma *dma;
>>>  	unsigned long pfn;
>>> +	unsigned int min_pagesz = __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
>>> +	unsigned int requested_alignment = (min_pagesz < PAGE_SIZE) ?
>>> +						PAGE_SIZE : min_pagesz;
>>>  
>>>  	/* Verify that none of our __u64 fields overflow */
>>>  	if (map->size != size || map->vaddr != vaddr || map->iova != iova)
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>  
>>> -	mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu))) - 1;
>>> -
>>> -	WARN_ON(mask & PAGE_MASK);
>>> -
>>>  	/* READ/WRITE from device perspective */
>>>  	if (map->flags & VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_WRITE)
>>>  		prot |= IOMMU_WRITE;
>>>  	if (map->flags & VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_READ)
>>>  		prot |= IOMMU_READ;
>>>  
>>> -	if (!prot || !size || (size | iova | vaddr) & mask)
>>> +	if (!prot || !size ||
>>> +		!IS_ALIGNED(size | iova | vaddr, requested_alignment))
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>  
>>>  	/* Don't allow IOVA or virtual address wrap */
>>
>> This is mostly ignoring the problems with sub-PAGE_SIZE mappings.  For
>> instance, we can only pin on PAGE_SIZE and therefore we only do
>> accounting on PAGE_SIZE, so if the user does 4K mappings across your 64K
>> page, that page gets pinned and accounted 16 times.  Are we going to
>> tell users that their locked memory limit needs to be 16x now?  The rest
>> of the code would need an audit as well to see what other sub-page bugs
>> might be hiding.  Thanks,
> 
> I don't see that. The pinning all happens the same in VFIO, which can
> then happily pass a 64k region to iommu_map. iommu_map will then call
> ->map in 4k chunks on the IOMMU driver ops.
> 
> Will
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-28 17:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-28 13:12 [RFC] vfio/type1: handle case where IOMMU does not support PAGE_SIZE size Eric Auger
2015-10-28 15:37 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-28 16:27 ` Alex Williamson
2015-10-28 17:10   ` Eric Auger
2015-10-28 17:37     ` Alex Williamson
2015-10-28 17:48       ` Eric Auger
2015-10-28 17:55         ` Will Deacon
2015-10-28 18:00           ` Eric Auger
2015-10-28 18:15             ` Alex Williamson
2015-10-28 17:14   ` Will Deacon
2015-10-28 17:17     ` Eric Auger [this message]
2015-10-28 17:28     ` Alex Williamson
2015-10-28 17:41       ` Eric Auger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56310341.7010307@linaro.org \
    --to=eric.auger@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).