From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: k.kozlowski@samsung.com (Krzysztof Kozlowski) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 08:56:34 +0900 Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Start using the 'reviewer' (R) tag In-Reply-To: <20151028143838.GG4058@x1> References: <20151028102832.GR5828@x1> <1446030399.2757.83.camel@perches.com> <20151028113932.GS5828@x1> <20151028121454.GA4058@x1> <20151028133438.GC4058@x1> <20151028143838.GG4058@x1> Message-ID: <563160B2.7070305@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 28.10.2015 23:38, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 28 Oct 2015, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> They are not maintainers according to your definition of maintainer >> that doesn't seem what most people agree with. > > "most people" so far are 3 people that I assume still want to be > Maintainers despite not actually conducting Maintainer duties, but > are rather Reviewers. I also have 2 Acks for this patch, so thus far > that's 3 that agree and 3 that do not. Unsurprisingly the ones that > agree are Maintainers and the ones who are not are (by my definition) > Reviewers -- go figure. > I am not sure on which side you put me finally. :) If there is a consensus among some more experienced developers that maintainer means branch and patches maintaining, then I won't see any problem with the patch nor with switching Samsung PMIC entries to review. In that case, that would be: Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Best regards, Krzysztof