linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] arm64/efi: do not assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB
@ 2015-10-29 14:07 Ard Biesheuvel
  2015-10-29 14:52 ` Timur Tabi
  2015-10-29 14:57 ` Will Deacon
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2015-10-29 14:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

The current arm64 Image relocation code in the UEFI stub assumes that
the dram_base argument it receives is always a multiple of 2 MB. In
reality, it is simply the lowest start address of all RAM entries in
the UEFI memory map, which means it could be any multiple of 4 KB.

Since the arm64 kernel Image needs to reside TEXT_OFFSET bytes beyond
a 2 MB aligned base, or it will fail to boot, make sure we round dram_base
to 2 MB before using it to calculate the relocation address.

Reported-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
---

If deemed acceptable, could we either get this into v4.3 or tag it for
stable (v4.3 only) please?

 arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
index 816120ece6bc..78dfbd34b6bf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/efi-stub.c
@@ -25,10 +25,20 @@ efi_status_t __init handle_kernel_image(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg,
 	unsigned long kernel_size, kernel_memsize = 0;
 	unsigned long nr_pages;
 	void *old_image_addr = (void *)*image_addr;
+	unsigned long preferred_offset;
+
+	/*
+	 * The preferred offset of the kernel Image is TEXT_OFFSET bytes beyond
+	 * a 2 MB aligned base, which itself may be lower than dram_base, as
+	 * long as the resulting offset equals or exceeds it.
+	 */
+	preferred_offset = round_down(dram_base, SZ_2M) + TEXT_OFFSET;
+	if (preferred_offset < dram_base)
+		preferred_offset += SZ_2M;
 
 	/* Relocate the image, if required. */
 	kernel_size = _edata - _text;
-	if (*image_addr != (dram_base + TEXT_OFFSET)) {
+	if (*image_addr != preferred_offset) {
 		kernel_memsize = kernel_size + (_end - _edata);
 
 		/*
@@ -42,7 +52,7 @@ efi_status_t __init handle_kernel_image(efi_system_table_t *sys_table_arg,
 		 * Mustang), we can still place the kernel@the address
 		 * 'dram_base + TEXT_OFFSET'.
 		 */
-		*image_addr = *reserve_addr = dram_base + TEXT_OFFSET;
+		*image_addr = *reserve_addr = preferred_offset;
 		nr_pages = round_up(kernel_memsize, EFI_ALLOC_ALIGN) /
 			   EFI_PAGE_SIZE;
 		status = efi_call_early(allocate_pages, EFI_ALLOCATE_ADDRESS,
-- 
2.1.4

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arm64/efi: do not assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB
  2015-10-29 14:07 [PATCH] arm64/efi: do not assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB Ard Biesheuvel
@ 2015-10-29 14:52 ` Timur Tabi
  2015-10-29 14:57 ` Will Deacon
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2015-10-29 14:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 10/29/2015 09:07 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The current arm64 Image relocation code in the UEFI stub assumes that
> the dram_base argument it receives is always a multiple of 2 MB. In
> reality, it is simply the lowest start address of all RAM entries in
> the UEFI memory map, which means it could be any multiple of 4 KB.
>
> Since the arm64 kernel Image needs to reside TEXT_OFFSET bytes beyond
> a 2 MB aligned base, or it will fail to boot, make sure we round dram_base
> to 2 MB before using it to calculate the relocation address.
>
> Reported-by: Timur Tabi<timur@codeaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland<mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel<ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>

This works for me

Tested-by: Timur Tabi<timur@codeaurora.org>

On my system, dram_base is 0x4000820000, and *image_addr is 
0x43956db000, preferred_offset is set to 0x4000880000.

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arm64/efi: do not assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB
  2015-10-29 14:07 [PATCH] arm64/efi: do not assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB Ard Biesheuvel
  2015-10-29 14:52 ` Timur Tabi
@ 2015-10-29 14:57 ` Will Deacon
  2015-10-29 15:00   ` Timur Tabi
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2015-10-29 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 03:07:25PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> The current arm64 Image relocation code in the UEFI stub assumes that
> the dram_base argument it receives is always a multiple of 2 MB. In
> reality, it is simply the lowest start address of all RAM entries in
> the UEFI memory map, which means it could be any multiple of 4 KB.
> 
> Since the arm64 kernel Image needs to reside TEXT_OFFSET bytes beyond
> a 2 MB aligned base, or it will fail to boot, make sure we round dram_base
> to 2 MB before using it to calculate the relocation address.
> 
> Reported-by: Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
> ---
> 
> If deemed acceptable, could we either get this into v4.3 or tag it for
> stable (v4.3 only) please?

So is this fixing a regression introduced in 4.3? If so, can I have a
Fixes: tag too, please? (I was under the impression that this was a
longstanding issue, but the thread hasn't been easy to follow).

Will

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arm64/efi: do not assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB
  2015-10-29 14:57 ` Will Deacon
@ 2015-10-29 15:00   ` Timur Tabi
  2015-10-29 15:21     ` Mark Rutland
  2015-10-29 15:23     ` Ard Biesheuvel
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Timur Tabi @ 2015-10-29 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 10/29/2015 09:57 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> So is this fixing a regression introduced in 4.3? If so, can I have a
> Fixes: tag too, please? (I was under the impression that this was a
> longstanding issue, but the thread hasn't been easy to follow).

It fixes a bug introduced by:

Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>  2015-07-24 06:38:27
Committer: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>  2015-07-27 05:08:41
Parent: ddeeefe2dfbe1fa6b116b9362b1bec465b64c873 (arm64/efi: efistub: 
Apply __init annotation)
Child:  739fa11938bec53a849b77b2042237a0e17c70ae (arm64/efi: do not 
assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB)
Branches: dcc, master, qserver, qserver2, remotes/origin/master, tty
Follows: v4.2-rc4
Precedes: v4.3-rc1

     arm64: efi: prefer AllocatePages() over efi_low_alloc() for vmlinux




-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the
Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arm64/efi: do not assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB
  2015-10-29 15:00   ` Timur Tabi
@ 2015-10-29 15:21     ` Mark Rutland
  2015-10-29 15:23     ` Ard Biesheuvel
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mark Rutland @ 2015-10-29 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 10:00:14AM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On 10/29/2015 09:57 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >So is this fixing a regression introduced in 4.3? If so, can I have a
> >Fixes: tag too, please? (I was under the impression that this was a
> >longstanding issue, but the thread hasn't been easy to follow).
> 
> It fixes a bug introduced by:
> 
> Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>  2015-07-24 06:38:27
> Committer: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>  2015-07-27 05:08:41
> Parent: ddeeefe2dfbe1fa6b116b9362b1bec465b64c873 (arm64/efi:
> efistub: Apply __init annotation)
> Child:  739fa11938bec53a849b77b2042237a0e17c70ae (arm64/efi: do not
> assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB)
> Branches: dcc, master, qserver, qserver2, remotes/origin/master, tty
> Follows: v4.2-rc4
> Precedes: v4.3-rc1
> 
>     arm64: efi: prefer AllocatePages() over efi_low_alloc() for vmlinux

As it wasn't in the context, that's commit ID e38457c361b30c5a, which
was introduced in v4.3-rc1.

However, the check on the base address was always buggy since its
introduction in v3.16 in commit 3c7f255039a2ad6e ("arm64: efi: add EFI
stub"), so that portion needs to be backported further.

Thanks,
Mark.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] arm64/efi: do not assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB
  2015-10-29 15:00   ` Timur Tabi
  2015-10-29 15:21     ` Mark Rutland
@ 2015-10-29 15:23     ` Ard Biesheuvel
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ard Biesheuvel @ 2015-10-29 15:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel


> On 29 okt. 2015, at 16:00, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org> wrote:
> 
>> On 10/29/2015 09:57 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
>> So is this fixing a regression introduced in 4.3? If so, can I have a
>> Fixes: tag too, please? (I was under the impression that this was a
>> longstanding issue, but the thread hasn't been easy to follow).
> 
> It fixes a bug introduced by:
> 
> Author: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>  2015-07-24 06:38:27
> Committer: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>  2015-07-27 05:08:41
> Parent: ddeeefe2dfbe1fa6b116b9362b1bec465b64c873 (arm64/efi: efistub: Apply __init annotation)
> Child:  739fa11938bec53a849b77b2042237a0e17c70ae (arm64/efi: do not assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB)
> Branches: dcc, master, qserver, qserver2, remotes/origin/master, tty
> Follows: v4.2-rc4
> Precedes: v4.3-rc1
> 
>    arm64: efi: prefer AllocatePages() over efi_low_alloc() for vmlinux
> 
> 


The code that existed before that also assumes incorrectly that dram_base is a multiple of 2MB, but since the patch won't apply cleanly, and nobody reported any problems, I think we only need to worry about 4.3

Ard.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-29 15:23 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-29 14:07 [PATCH] arm64/efi: do not assume DRAM base is aligned to 2 MB Ard Biesheuvel
2015-10-29 14:52 ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-29 14:57 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-29 15:00   ` Timur Tabi
2015-10-29 15:21     ` Mark Rutland
2015-10-29 15:23     ` Ard Biesheuvel

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).