From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: caesar.upstream@gmail.com (Caesar Wang) Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:43:33 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] clocksource: rockchip: Make the driver more compatible In-Reply-To: <2486591.i0n1KlEQoc@diego> References: <1443147298-12603-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> <1443147298-12603-2-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> <560A10FB.7040408@linaro.org> <2486591.i0n1KlEQoc@diego> Message-ID: <5632E765.4010207@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Daniel, ? 2015?10?01? 03:14, Heiko St?bner ??: > Hi Daniel, > > Am Dienstag, 29. September 2015, 06:18:03 schrieb Daniel Lezcano: >> On 09/25/2015 04:14 AM, Caesar Wang wrote: >>> Build the arm64 SoCs (e.g.: RK3368) on Rockchip platform, >>> There are some failure with build up on timer driver for rockchip. >>> >>> Says: >>> /tmp/ccdAnNy5.s:47: Error: missing immediate expression at operand 1 -- >>> `dsb` >>> ... >>> >>> The problem was different semantics of dsb on btw arm32 and arm64, >>> Here we can convert the dsb with insteading of dsb(sy).The "sy" param >>> is the default which you are allow to omit, so on arm32 dsb()and dsb(sy) >>> are the same. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Caesar Wang >> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano > as you have "just" Acked these patches, I guess you are expecting them to go > through the same tree as the devicetree changes, right? I'm wonder if someone will apply this series patchs but the wait.:-) In fact, I'm no sure that the Acked is really meaning.:- > > Thanks > Heiko > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip -- Thanks, Caesar