From: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com (Dietmar Eggemann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM64: Enable multi-core scheduler support by default
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 12:29:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5633628C.1010200@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151029171944.GS8899@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On 10/29/2015 05:19 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 05:55:49PM +0100, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> Make sure that the task scheduler domain hierarchy is set-up correctly
>> on systems with single or multi-cluster topology.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/configs/defconfig | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> index 34d71dd86781..dc70d715bc38 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/configs/defconfig
>> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ CONFIG_PCI=y
>> CONFIG_PCI_MSI=y
>> CONFIG_PCI_XGENE=y
>> CONFIG_SMP=y
>> +CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y
>> CONFIG_PREEMPT=y
>> CONFIG_KSM=y
>> CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y
>
> Question: does enabling this option have any (positive) effect on the
> vanilla kernel or it requires additional patches like EAS?
It improves the task scheduler decisions on multi-cluster systems. You
have to iterate over all cpu's less frequently when gathering the sched
group statistics e.g. during CFS load-balancing.
You essentially replace a flat (all cpus) with an hierarchical approach
(lowest level: sched group eq. cpu, next level: sched group eq. cluster)
and do CFS load balancing frequently between two cpu's of the same
cluster (lowest level) and less frequently between two cpus from
different cluster.
Not sure that I would see an effect on the performance score on a JUNO
board when running hackbench. Could give it a try ... Probably easier to
spot on a machine with >32 logical cpus.
EAS has to work with both approaches although we do all our tests with
CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y. EAS operates on sched groups so the actual structure
of the sched domain hierarchy is hidden. (at least in theory).
For me CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y is something I would expect when I evaluate the
task scheduler on a multi-cluster system.
-- Dietmar
[...]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-30 12:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 16:55 [PATCH] ARM64: Enable multi-core scheduler support by default Dietmar Eggemann
2015-10-28 14:01 ` Punit Agrawal
2015-10-29 17:19 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-30 12:29 ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2015-10-30 15:35 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5633628C.1010200@arm.com \
--to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).