From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 17:32:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 03/22] clocksource/drivers/rockchip: Make the driver more
 compatible
In-Reply-To: <5093304.EN6Bc2EjLr@wuerfel>
References: <1446469011-22710-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
 <1446469011-22710-3-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
 <5093304.EN6Bc2EjLr@wuerfel>
Message-ID: <56379016.1080601@linaro.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 11/02/2015 04:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Monday 02 November 2015 13:56:31 Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>   static inline void rk_timer_disable(struct clock_event_device *ce)
>>   {
>>          writel_relaxed(TIMER_DISABLE, rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
>> -       dsb();
>> +       dsb(sy);
>>   }
>>
>>   static inline void rk_timer_enable(struct clock_event_device *ce, u32 flags)
>>   {
>>          writel_relaxed(TIMER_ENABLE | TIMER_INT_UNMASK | flags,
>>                         rk_base(ce) + TIMER_CONTROL_REG);
>> -       dsb();
>> +       dsb(sy);
>>   }
>>
>>
>
> This will fail the compile test, because dsb() is not available on non-ARM
> architectures. Would it be enough to just use the normal writel() accessor
> here?

That's a good question and I believe we can remove it but I have to 
setup a rockchip board before doing the changes in order to test.

I the meantime added the COMPILE_TEST option but restricted it to ARM 
and ARM64.



-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog