From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli) Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2015 12:33:06 -0800 Subject: [PATCH v8 1/2] arm-soc: Import initial tango4 device tree In-Reply-To: <56377ED5.4070203@sigmadesigns.com> References: <56377E76.2080209@sigmadesigns.com> <56377ED5.4070203@sigmadesigns.com> Message-ID: <5637C882.7060003@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 02/11/15 07:18, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > This device tree was tested on a Sigma Designs SMP8758 Vantage-1172 > development board. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez > --- > arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 2 + > arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-common.dtsi | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-smp8758.dtsi | 30 ++++++++ > arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-vantage-1172.dts | 24 ++++++ > 4 files changed, 177 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-common.dtsi > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-smp8758.dtsi > create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-vantage-1172.dts Since you are introducing DTS with compatible strings etc. you need to document these in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ as well for people to know how to write their own for their Tango4-based designs. > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile > index 246473a244f6..2499295051d5 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile > @@ -605,6 +605,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN8I) += \ > dtb-$(CONFIG_MACH_SUN9I) += \ > sun9i-a80-optimus.dtb \ > sun9i-a80-cubieboard4.dtb > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TANGOX) += \ > + tango4-vantage-1172.dtb > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_TEGRA_2x_SOC) += \ > tegra20-harmony.dtb \ > tegra20-iris-512.dtb \ > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-common.dtsi > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..90e9a6e736ae > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-common.dtsi > @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@ > +/* > + * Derived from Mans Rullgard's Tango3 DT > + * https://github.com/mansr/linux-tangox > + */ Most DTSes these days contain a proper license, typically BSD, yours should have one too. > + > +#include > + > +/ { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + > + clocks { > + ranges; > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <1>; > + > + xtal: xtal { > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > + clock-frequency = <27000000>; > + #clock-cells = <0>; > + }; > + > + clkgen: clkgen at 10000 { > + compatible = "sigma,tango4-clkgen"; > + reg = <0x10000 0x40>; > + clocks = <&xtal>; > + clock-output-names = "cpuclk", "sysclk"; > + #clock-cells = <1>; > + }; > + }; Do not you have some sort of internal bus/bridge which maps these ARM peripherals to your SoC? You have a simple-bus node later on for your internal and own IPs, it would seem logical to have such a thing here as well for these ARM peripherals. [snip] > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-smp8758.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-smp8758.dtsi > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..4eb23a12e27f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tango4-smp8758.dtsi > @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ > +#include > + > +/ { > + cpus { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + enable-method = "sigma,tango4-smp"; > + > + cpu0: cpu at 0 { > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a9"; > + device_type = "cpu"; > + reg = <0>; Missing next-level-cache property and 'enable-method' property. -- Florian