From: yang.shi@linaro.org (Shi, Yang)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix div-by-zero case
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 10:41:53 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <563A5171.5070608@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABg9mcuAuoSBg4zWYHnaTzAGsH4BK5-VhD=HRDmsHJRCUrnJUw@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/4/2015 10:25 AM, Z Lim wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Shi, Yang <yang.shi@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 11/3/2015 11:04 PM, Xi Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
>>>> case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
>>>> + {
>>>> + const u8 r0 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_0];
>>>> +
>>>> + /* if (src == 0) return 0 */
>>>> + jmp_offset = 3; /* skip ahead to else path */
>>>> + check_imm19(jmp_offset);
>>>> + emit(A64_CBNZ(is64, src, jmp_offset), ctx);
>>>> + emit(A64_MOVZ(1, r0, 0, 0), ctx);
>>>> + jmp_offset = epilogue_offset(ctx);
>>>> + check_imm26(jmp_offset);
>>>> + emit(A64_B(jmp_offset), ctx);
>>>> + /* else */
>>>> emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
>>>> break;
>>>> + }
>>>> case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
>>>> case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
>>>
>>>
>>> BPF_MOD might need the same fix.
>
> I'll post a fix for this case as well.
>
>>
>>
>> Agreed, and we may need add one more test cases in test_bpf module to cover
>> MOD?
>
> Let me know if you have a test case ready :)
Does the below change look like a valid test?
+ "MOD default X",
+ .u.insns = {
+ /*
+ * A = 0x42
+ * A = A mod X ; this halt the filter execution
if X is 0
+ * ret 0x42
+ */
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_LD | BPF_IMM, 0x42),
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X, 0),
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_K, 0x42),
+ },
+ CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ {},
+ { {0x1, 0x0 } },
+ },
+ {
+ "MOD default A",
+ .u.insns = {
+ /*
+ * A = A mod 1
+ * ret A
+ */
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_K, 0x1),
+ BPF_STMT(BPF_RET | BPF_A, 0x0),
+ },
+ CLASSIC | FLAG_NO_DATA,
+ {},
+ { {0x1, 0x0 } },
+ },
My test result with it:
test_bpf: #284 MOD default X jited:1 ret 66 != 0 FAIL (1 times)
test_bpf: #285 MOD default A jited:1 102 PASS
If it looks right, I will post a patch to add the test cases.
Thanks,
Yang
>
>>
>> Yang
>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>>> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-04 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-04 6:56 [PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix div-by-zero case Zi Shen Lim
2015-11-04 7:04 ` Xi Wang
2015-11-04 18:21 ` Shi, Yang
2015-11-04 18:25 ` Z Lim
2015-11-04 18:41 ` Shi, Yang [this message]
2015-11-04 19:39 ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-11-04 18:03 ` Shi, Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=563A5171.5070608@linaro.org \
--to=yang.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).