From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: JBeulich@suse.com (Jan Beulich) Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2015 10:21:08 -0700 Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen/arm: introduce HYPERVISOR_dom0_op on arm and arm64 In-Reply-To: <1446743385-12848-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> References: <1446743385-12848-2-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Message-ID: <563B9E1402000078000B247C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org >>> On 05.11.15 at 18:09, wrote: > --- a/arch/arm/xen/hypercall.S > +++ b/arch/arm/xen/hypercall.S > @@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ HYPERCALL2(memory_op); > HYPERCALL2(physdev_op); > HYPERCALL3(vcpu_op); > HYPERCALL1(tmem_op); > +HYPERCALL1(dom0_op); Assuming this somehow tries to mirror x86 naming - time to rename it there? I don't see why you'd want to introduce a dom0_op when it has been renamed to platform_op many years ago - see public/dom0_ops.h. Jan