linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: takahiro.akashi@linaro.org (AKASHI Takahiro)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: extract a field correctly in cpuid_feature_extract_field()
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:04:49 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <564C2311.3040904@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564AF2F7.9030106@arm.com>

On 11/17/2015 06:27 PM, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> On 17/11/15 07:15, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 17 November 2015 at 06:05, AKASHI Takahiro
>> <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org> wrote:
>>> Basically, cpuid_feature_extract_field() does shift-left and then
>>> shift-right to extract a specific field in an operand. But
>>> a shift-left'ed value is casted to 's64' and so a succeeding shift-right
>>> operation results in creating a sign-extended (and bogus) value.
>>>
>>
>> This is intentional. This function was created specifically for
>> extracting CPU feature fields, which are signed 4-bit quantities,
>> where positive values represent incremental functionality, and
>> negative values are reserved. This is poorly documented in the ARM ARM
>> though.

Good. So please take my patch as a bug report because perf record -e mem:XXX:x
doesn't work with v4.4-rc1 (if # of hw breakpoints is over 0x7, e.g. default
case on fast model.)

> Right. Akash's fix could break other pieces (like FP/ASIMD support in IDAA64PFR0
> where, 0xf => function not implemented).

IMO, 0xf is 0xf, not -1.
(I don't think "All other values are reserved." means that the value is *signed*.)

Thanks,
-Takahiro AKASHI

>>
>> Using this function for extracting 4-bit unsigned values is a mistake.
>>
>
> I will take a look at this one.
>
> Thanks for pointing it out.
>
> Suzuki
>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-18  7:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-17  5:05 [PATCH] arm64: extract a field correctly in cpuid_feature_extract_field() AKASHI Takahiro
2015-11-17  7:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-17  9:27   ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-11-17 10:39     ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-11-18  7:04     ` AKASHI Takahiro [this message]
2015-11-18  7:26       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-18  8:08         ` AKASHI Takahiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=564C2311.3040904@linaro.org \
    --to=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).