From: andre.przywara@arm.com (Andre Przywara)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] kvmtool: Cleanup kernel loading
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:29:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <564C530A.3010604@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151102145846.GH29657@arm.com>
Hi Will,
On 02/11/15 14:58, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 06:26:53PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote:
>> Hi,
>
> Hello Andre,
>
>> this series cleans up kvmtool's kernel loading functionality a bit.
>> It has been broken out of a previous series I sent [1] and contains
>> just the cleanup and bug fix parts, which should be less controversial
>> and thus easier to merge ;-)
>> I will resend the pipe loading part later on as a separate series.
>>
>> The first patch properly abstracts kernel loading to move
>> responsibility into each architecture's code. It removes quite some
>> ugly code from the generic kvm.c file.
>> The later patches address the naive usage of read(2) to, well, read
>> data from files. Doing this without coping with the subtleties of
>> the UNIX read semantics (returning with less or none data read is not
>> an error) can provoke hard to debug failures.
>> So these patches make use of the existing and one new wrapper function
>> to make sure we read everything we actually wanted to.
>> The last patch moves the ARM kernel loading code into the proper
>> location to be in line with the other architectures.
>>
>> Please have a look and give some comments!
>
> Looks good to me, but I'd like to see some comments from some mips/ppc/x86
> people on the changes you're making over there.
Sounds reasonable, but no answers yet.
Can you take at least patch 1 and 2 meanwhile, preferably 6 and 7 (the
ARM parts) also if you are OK with it?
I have other patches that depend on 1/7 and 2/7, so having them upstream
would help me and reduce further dependency churn.
I am happy to resend the remaining patches for further discussion later.
Cheers,
Andre.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-18 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-30 18:26 [PATCH 0/7] kvmtool: Cleanup kernel loading Andre Przywara
2015-10-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] Refactor kernel image loading Andre Przywara
2015-10-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] provide generic read_file() implementation Andre Przywara
2015-10-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] powerpc: use read_file() in kernel and initrd loading Andre Przywara
2015-10-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] MIPS: use read wrappers in kernel loading Andre Przywara
2015-10-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86: " Andre Przywara
2015-10-30 18:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] arm/arm64: use read_file() in kernel and initrd loading Andre Przywara
2015-10-30 18:27 ` [PATCH 7/7] arm: move kernel loading into arm/kvm.c Andre Przywara
2015-11-02 14:58 ` [PATCH 0/7] kvmtool: Cleanup kernel loading Will Deacon
2015-11-02 15:17 ` Dimitri John Ledkov
2015-11-02 16:03 ` Andre Przywara
2015-11-18 10:29 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2015-11-18 17:08 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=564C530A.3010604@arm.com \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).