From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: julien.grall@citrix.com (Julien Grall)
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 12:27:43 +0000
Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 06/13] Xen: ARM: Add support for mapping amba
 device mmio
In-Reply-To: <564C14CA.9080601@huawei.com>
References: <1447754231-7772-1-git-send-email-shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
 <1447754231-7772-7-git-send-email-shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
 <20151117144040.GI3003@char.us.oracle.com> <564C14CA.9080601@huawei.com>
Message-ID: <564C6EBF.7010105@citrix.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 18/11/15 06:03, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>
>> What about the removal of a bus device? No need to handle that?
>>
> I have thought about removal before. I think there is little(or no)
> chance for AMBA and platform bus devices to be removed. It's not like
> the PCI devices which will be hot-unplug.
> Maybe I'm not right. If so, it's fine to add a case to handle the removal.

What about the platform device passthrough case?

In anycase, if the AMBA platform provides a removal method, there is
harmless to implement it.

Regards,

-- 
Julien Grall