From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:07:51 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM64: dts: enable clock support for Broadcom NS2 In-Reply-To: <564D11C0.409@broadcom.com> References: <1447888430-4451-1-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com> <1447888430-4451-4-git-send-email-jonmason@broadcom.com> <564D11C0.409@broadcom.com> Message-ID: <564D12D7.7090407@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 18/11/15 16:03, Ray Jui wrote: > > > On 11/18/2015 3:13 PM, Jon Mason wrote: >> Add device tree entries for clock support for Broadcom Northstar 2 SoC >> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason >> --- >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi | 80 >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi >> index 9610822..a510d3a 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/broadcom/ns2.dtsi >> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ >> */ >> >> #include >> +#include >> >> /memreserve/ 0x84b00000 0x00000008; >> >> @@ -109,6 +110,33 @@ >> <&A57_3>; >> }; >> >> + clocks { > > Is this a new convention? That is, group all clocks without a base > register address in a node named "clocks", but at the same time, put all > other clocks with base register address under a bus node. I do not think that is new, lots of platforms do that. The clock providers/controllers would typically be in the 'bus' nodes because it has a register interface, while the synthetic clocks would be under 'clocks'. -- Florian