From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cov@codeaurora.org (Christopher Covington) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:36:00 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v11 3/5] arm: introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT, PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING and pv_time_ops In-Reply-To: References: <1446737696-9749-3-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Message-ID: <564F2FD0.6040905@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Stefano, On 11/20/2015 09:31 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Thu, 5 Nov 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >>> Introduce CONFIG_PARAVIRT and PARAVIRT_TIME_ACCOUNTING on ARM. >>> >>> The only paravirt interface supported is pv_time_ops.steal_clock, so no >>> runtime pvops patching needed. >>> >>> This allows us to make use of steal_account_process_tick for stolen >>> ticks accounting. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini >>> Acked-by: Christopher Covington >>> Acked-by: Ian Campbell >>> CC: linux at arm.linux.org.uk >>> CC: will.deacon at arm.com >>> CC: nico at linaro.org >>> CC: marc.zyngier at arm.com >>> CC: cov at codeaurora.org >>> CC: arnd at arndb.de >>> CC: olof at lixom.net >> >> >> Russell, >> are you OK with this patch? > > Russell, > > I am going to drop this patch and add a small #ifdef to > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c to be able to use this functionality on arm64. > > If you change your mind let me know. It appears to me as though he's not copied on this message. Regards, Christopher Covington -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project