linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jlinton@redhat.com (Jeremy Linton)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] arm64: Boot failure on m400 with new cont PTEs
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:31:31 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56532343.8030908@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151123121514.GB32300@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 11/23/2015 06:15 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> That's a complete fix indeed but it would require some more testing and
> I don't think it's feasible for 4.4-rc. In the meantime, I propose that
> we revert the contiguous PTE patches and push them again once we fix the
> TLB conflict problems.


The problem as you say exists with the block mappings as well, and the 
explicit TLB flush there is apparently sufficient to keep this problem 
from occurring. The 1 line explicit flush is sufficient to keep it from 
happening in the late mapping case as well, and actually fixes a problem 
that was in the kernel from before these patches (the complete lack of 
flush in paths calling create_mapping_late()). So, I fail to see how 
reverting the patch fixes anything, it only returns to the previously 
(now known) to be bad code path.

BTW: The M400, has other issues that keep it from booting with ACPI 
firmware (the 4.3 EOI changes irritate a 'bug' in the MADT table).

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-23 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-18 15:03 [PATCH] [PATCH] arm64: Boot failure on m400 with new cont PTEs Jeremy Linton
2015-11-18 15:20 ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-18 16:08   ` Jeremy Linton
2015-11-18 16:29     ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-18 17:14       ` Jeremy Linton
2015-11-18 18:04         ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-18 19:31           ` Jeremy Linton
2015-11-19 11:31             ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-20 19:52               ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-23 12:15                 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-23 13:49                   ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-23 14:48                     ` Jeremy Linton
2015-11-23 15:41                       ` Will Deacon
2015-11-23 15:46                         ` Jeremy Linton
2015-11-23 14:31                   ` Jeremy Linton [this message]
2015-11-20 20:15               ` Mark Rutland
2015-11-23 15:51       ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-23 16:02         ` Jeremy Linton
2015-11-23 16:37           ` Laura Abbott
2015-11-23 16:42             ` Jeremy Linton
2015-11-23 17:52               ` Laura Abbott
2015-11-23 18:46                 ` Jeremy Linton
2015-11-24  8:04               ` Ard Biesheuvel
2015-11-23 16:52           ` Catalin Marinas
2015-11-23 17:24             ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56532343.8030908@redhat.com \
    --to=jlinton@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).