From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zhaoshenglong@huawei.com (Shannon Zhao) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 09:45:17 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v3 12/62] ACPICA: ACPI 6.0: Add changes for FADT table In-Reply-To: <5654583302000078000B85A6@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> References: <1447753261-7552-1-git-send-email-shannon.zhao@linaro.org> <1447753261-7552-13-git-send-email-shannon.zhao@linaro.org> <5654583302000078000B85A6@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Message-ID: <565512AD.6010609@huawei.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 2015/11/24 19:29, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 17.11.15 at 10:40, wrote: >> From: Bob Moore >> >> ACPICA commit 72b0b6741990f619f6aaa915302836b7cbb41ac4 >> >> One new 64-bit field at the end of the table. >> FADT version is now 6. >> >> Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/72b0b674 >> Signed-off-by: Bob Moore >> Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng >> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki >> [Linux commit aeb823bbacc2a3aaee29eda5875b58a049fa1f78] >> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao >> --- >> xen/include/acpi/actbl.h | 17 ++++++++++------- >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > So while I applied this one after fixing it up, I'm not going to do any > further fixups to later patches I also meant to apply. I realize the > fixups may have been necessary because of me applying them in > other than the submitted sequence, but then again such general > imports from ACPICA/Linux should have been independent of > earlier changes. I.e. either earlier patches in the series wrongly > touch these headers, or there's a general problem with the series. > I will split this patch set in several parts and the first part would be the changes and updates of ACPI SPEC 5.0~6.0. So maybe you could apply them at next version. Thanks, -- Shannon