From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dingtianhong@huawei.com (Ding Tianhong)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 15:36:41 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v9 0/4] arm64: arch_timer: Add workaround for
 hisilicon-161010101 erratum
In-Reply-To: <20170120150428.GC22152@leverpostej>
References: <1484832916-7248-1-git-send-email-dingtianhong@huawei.com>
 <20170120150428.GC22152@leverpostej>
Message-ID: <56554f95-b51d-abc7-8ac0-7f561728375a@huawei.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org



On 2017/1/20 23:04, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 19, 2017 at 09:35:12PM +0800, Ding Tianhong wrote:
>> Ding Tianhong (4):
>>   arm64: arch_timer: Add device tree binding for hisilicon-161010101
>>     erratum
>>   arm64: arch_timer: Introduce a generic erratum handing mechanism for
>>     fsl-a008585
>>   arm64: arch_timer: Work around Erratum Hisilicon-161010101
>>   arm64: arch timer: Add timer erratum property for Hip05-d02 and
>>     Hip06-d03
>>
>>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt    |   9 --
>>  Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt             |  43 +++---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/arch_timer.txt         |   6 +
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hip05.dtsi           |   1 +
>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hip06.dtsi           |   1 +
>>  arch/arm64/include/asm/arch_timer.h                |  38 ++----
>>  drivers/clocksource/Kconfig                        |  18 +++
>>  drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c               | 150 +++++++++++++++------
>>  8 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 95 deletions(-)
> 
> I've picked these up (with a few local cleanups), given that some local
> testing, and pushed the result to a branch [1] on my git repo.
> 
> There are likely to be clashes with the arm64 tree (e.g. for
> silicon-errata.txt), and we're also likely to have more arch timer
> updates shortly for the GTDT stuff, so I think the best bet is for both
> arm64 and the clocksource tree to pull that branch for v4.11.
> 
> Alternatively, we could take this all through the arm64 tree, if the
> clocksource maintainers are happy with that.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 

Hi Mark:

It is really a great milestone now, Thanks for the help, and I will still wait
for Marc's new opinion for this version, hoping no need to change anything else. :)

Thanks
Ding

> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 
> [1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arch-timer/hisi-161010101
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> 
> .
>