From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rjui@broadcom.com (Ray Jui) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 08:24:21 -0800 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: enable pinctrl for Broadcom NSP In-Reply-To: <565DC555.2070004@broadcom.com> References: <1448042309-46445-1-git-send-email-yrdreddy@broadcom.com> <5654FBE4.5010802@gmail.com> <565DC555.2070004@broadcom.com> Message-ID: <565DC9B5.8070801@broadcom.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/1/2015 8:05 AM, Scott Branden wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On 15-12-01 02:00 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Florian Fainelli >> wrote: >>> On 20/11/15 09:58, Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy wrote: >>>> This enables the pinctrl support for Broadcom NSP SoC >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy >>>> >>> >>> Looks like a sane pinctrl node here, unless there are objections, I >>> would like to go ahead and apply this for v4.5, thanks! >> >> I'm waiting for an indication from the other BCM pinctrl >> maintainers to tell whether this SoC is unique enough to deserve >> its own driver. > If Stephen Warren is the other maintainer you are talking about he does > not work at Broadcom. I don't think he is familiar with the variety of > pinctrl implementations present. But yes, the pinctrl implementations > have been rather unique in these Socs. As Ray indicated we're trying to > get the silicon designers to standardize more going forward so we don't > have to create unique drivers for these SoCs. Yes. Hopefully NSP and NS2 will be the last iProc based SoCs that require unique pinmux driver. >> >> Yours, >> Linus Walleij >> > > Regards, > Scott > Thanks, Ray