From: grygorii.strashko@ti.com (Grygorii Strashko)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Change core_initcall levels to postcore_initcall
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 20:08:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56608518.7060406@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151203164113.GS23396@atomide.com>
On 12/03/2015 06:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> [151203 08:35]:
>> On 12/03/2015 06:00 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [151130 08:29]:
>>>> We want to be able to probe a few selected device drivers before hwmod
>>>> code populates the clocks in omap_hwmod_setup_all(). This allows us to
>>>> convert most of the clock drivers into regular device drivers.
>>
>> if understand things right, ti clks now will be populated and initialized
>> from
>> __omap_sync32k_timer_init
>> - omap_clk_init()
>> - ..
>> - of_clk_init()
>> - ..
>> - omap_clk_soc_init()
>>
>> and __omap_sync32k_timer_init(), in turn, will be called from:
>> arch/arm/kernel/time.c
>> - time_init()
>> machine_desc->init_time();
>> (without your patch 1).
>
> Yes that's the current approach, but we can do better. We only need the following
> clocks for system timers at that point:
>
> - mux clocks to select between the 32k and hf oscillator source
>
> - clkctrl driver to gate the ocp clock
>
> All the other clocks can be initialized at core_initcall time with this change.
>
>> So, I don't see real dependency here between clk initialization and hwmods :(
>
> You don't because it's only implemented so far for the dm814x ADPLL clock :)
>
> That I posted as "[PATCH 0/2] Clock driver for dm814x ADPLL". Note how it's
> just a regular device driver that also works as loadable module on boards that
> have all the necessary clocks enabled already by the bootloader.
>
Ah. Thanks. I see it now.
--
regards,
-grygorii
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-03 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-30 16:26 [PATCH 0/2] Initcall changes for omaps Tony Lindgren
2015-11-30 16:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Initialize timers later with late_time_init Tony Lindgren
2015-12-01 13:52 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-12-01 15:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-11-30 16:26 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP2+: Change core_initcall levels to postcore_initcall Tony Lindgren
2015-12-03 16:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-03 16:34 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-12-03 16:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-03 18:08 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56608518.7060406@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).