From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla) Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 17:33:37 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: at91: fix pinctrl driver selection In-Reply-To: <1449249513-22972-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> References: <1449249513-22972-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <5661CE71.5050206@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 04/12/15 17:18, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > From: Ludovic Desroches > > Move the selection of the pinctrl driver to SoC family level since we > have two pinctrl drivers. It is useless to select one which is not > compatible with the SoC. > > [abelloni: fixed pm.c when only sama2d2 is selected] > Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > --- > arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 6 +++++- > arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 7 ++++++- > 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > [...] > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c > index 80e277cfcc8b..01cbb17e6f6b 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c > @@ -41,8 +41,10 @@ > * implementation should be moved down into the pinctrl driver and get > * called as part of the generic suspend/resume path. > */ > +#ifdef PINCTRL_AT91 Accidentally glanced at this patch when my mail client got hung at this patch :), I think you mean CONFIG_PINCTRL_AT91 here and later below. -- Regards, Sudeep