[PATCH V3 2/6] acpi: pci: Setup MSI domain for ACPI based pci devices

[tn@semihalf.com (Tomasz Nowicki)]

Hi Marc,


On 11/22/2015 12:35 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 15:18:45 -0600
> Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Marc,
>>
>> On 11/19/15 06:08, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 11:47:25 -0700
>>> Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Suravee,
>>>
>>> Sorry it took so long to get to this series. Comments below.
>> No worry.
>>
>>>> This patch introduces pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(), which returns
>>>> the MSI domain of the specified PCI host bridge with DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI
>>>> bus token. Then, it is assigned to pci device.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 13 +++++++++++++
>>>>    drivers/pci/probe.c    |  2 ++
>>>>    include/linux/pci.h    |  7 +++++++
>>>>    3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>>>> index a32ba75..0e21ef4 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c
>>>> @@ -9,7 +9,9 @@
>>>>
>>>>    #include <linux/delay.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/init.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/pci.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/msi.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/pci_hotplug.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/module.h>
>>>>    #include <linux/pci-aspm.h>
>>>> @@ -689,6 +691,17 @@ static struct acpi_bus_type acpi_pci_bus = {
>>>>    	.cleanup = pci_acpi_cleanup,
>>>>    };
>>>>
>>>> +struct irq_domain *pci_host_bridge_acpi_msi_domain(struct pci_bus *bus)
>>>> +{
>>>> +	struct irq_domain *dom = NULL;
>>>> +	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = pci_msi_get_fwnode(&bus->dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +	if (fwnode)
>>>> +		dom = irq_find_matching_fwnode(fwnode,
>>>> +					       DOMAIN_BUS_PCI_MSI);
>>>> +	return dom;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>> Given this, I really question the need for what you define in patch #1
>>> to be standalone. It is only used by ACPI (DT has its own private
>>> helpers), and it is so far unlikely that it will be of any use for
>>> other firmware interfaces.
>>>
>>> My suggestion is to get rid of pci_msi_get_fwnode() and move the
>>> registration helper into this file. That'd be much simpler.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> 	M.
>>>
>> Ok, I'll take care of this. I assume the rest of the patches looks ok.
> I still need to finish going through it (I have minor comments so far
> on some of the other patches), but I want to get the core ACPI stuff in
> shape before doing anything else.
I am trying to do similar thing for GICv3 & ITS, can you please have a look:
http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1510.1/06139.html

Can you please explain what ACPI core changes do you mean?

Regards,
Tomasz