From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: harvey.hunt@imgtec.com (Harvey Hunt) Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 10:30:40 +0000 Subject: [PATCH 05/23] mtd: nand: jz4770: kill the ->ecc_layout field In-Reply-To: <1449527178-5930-6-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> References: <1449527178-5930-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1449527178-5930-6-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <5666B150.2030406@imgtec.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Boris, On 07/12/15 22:26, Boris Brezillon wrote: > ->ecc_layout is not used by any board file. Kill this field to avoid any > confusion. New boards are encouraged to use the default ECC layout defined > in NAND core. > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > --- > arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4740_nand.h | 2 -- > drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c | 3 --- > 2 files changed, 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4740_nand.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4740_nand.h > index 79cff26..398733e 100644 > --- a/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4740_nand.h > +++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4740_nand.h > @@ -25,8 +25,6 @@ struct jz_nand_platform_data { > int num_partitions; > struct mtd_partition *partitions; > > - struct nand_ecclayout *ecc_layout; > - > unsigned char banks[JZ_NAND_NUM_BANKS]; > > void (*ident_callback)(struct platform_device *, struct nand_chip *, > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c > index 5a99a93..c4fe446 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/jz4740_nand.c > @@ -446,9 +446,6 @@ static int jz_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > chip->ecc.bytes = 9; > chip->ecc.strength = 4; > > - if (pdata) > - chip->ecc.layout = pdata->ecc_layout; > - > chip->chip_delay = 50; > chip->cmd_ctrl = jz_nand_cmd_ctrl; > chip->select_chip = jz_nand_select_chip; > Is there a typo in this commit title? The JZ4740 and JZ4770 have quite different NAND controller interfaces, so I don't think that the JZ4740 driver will support the JZ4770. Thanks, Harvey