From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v6 14/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR register
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:59:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56670C5D.3020407@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449578860-15808-15-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
On 08/12/15 12:47, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
>
> Since the reset value of PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR is UNKNOWN, use
> reset_unknown for its reset handler. Add a new case to emulate writing
> PMOVSSET or PMOVSCLR register.
>
> When writing non-zero value to PMOVSSET, pend PMU interrupt. When the
> value writing to PMOVSCLR is equal to the current value, clear the PMU
> pending interrupt.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++--
> include/kvm/arm_pmu.h | 4 +++
> virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c | 72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 100 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> index c1dffb2..c830fde 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
> @@ -601,6 +601,15 @@ static bool access_pmu_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~p->regval;
> break;
> }
> + case PMOVSSET_EL0: {
> + if (r->CRm == 14)
> + /* accessing PMOVSSET_EL0 */
> + kvm_pmu_overflow_set(vcpu, p->regval);
> + else
> + /* accessing PMOVSCLR_EL0 */
> + kvm_pmu_overflow_clear(vcpu, p->regval);
> + break;
> + }
> case PMCR_EL0: {
> /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -847,7 +856,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMCNTENSET_EL0 },
> /* PMOVSCLR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b011),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMOVSSET_EL0 },
> /* PMSWINC_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1100), Op2(0b100),
> trap_raz_wi },
> @@ -874,7 +883,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
> trap_raz_wi },
> /* PMOVSSET_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1110), Op2(0b011),
> - trap_raz_wi },
> + access_pmu_regs, reset_unknown, PMOVSSET_EL0 },
>
> /* TPIDR_EL0 */
> { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b011), CRn(0b1101), CRm(0b0000), Op2(0b010),
> @@ -1184,6 +1193,15 @@ static bool access_pmu_cp15_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg) &= ~p->regval;
> break;
> }
> + case c9_PMOVSSET: {
> + if (r->CRm == 14)
> + /* accessing c9_PMOVSSET */
> + kvm_pmu_overflow_set(vcpu, p->regval);
> + else
> + /* accessing c9_PMOVSCLR */
> + kvm_pmu_overflow_clear(vcpu, p->regval);
> + break;
> + }
> case c9_PMCR: {
> /* Only update writeable bits of PMCR */
> val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, r->reg);
> @@ -1271,7 +1289,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 2), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMCNTENSET },
> - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), trap_raz_wi },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 3), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + NULL, c9_PMOVSSET },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 5), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMSELR },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(12), Op2( 6), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> @@ -1287,6 +1306,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
> NULL, c9_PMINTENSET },
> { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 2), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> NULL, c9_PMINTENSET },
> + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 3), access_pmu_cp15_regs,
> + NULL, c9_PMOVSSET },
>
> { Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 2), Op2( 0), access_vm_reg, NULL, c10_PRRR },
> { Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 2), Op2( 1), access_vm_reg, NULL, c10_NMRR },
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index e731656..a76df52 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
> u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx);
> void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val);
> void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable);
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val);
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val);
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
> u32 select_idx);
> #else
> @@ -50,6 +52,8 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 select_idx)
> }
> void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val) {}
> void kvm_pmu_enable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val, bool all_enable) {}
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val) {}
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val) {}
> void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 data,
> u32 select_idx) {}
> #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index 45586d2..ba7d11c 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -136,6 +136,78 @@ void kvm_pmu_disable_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> }
> }
>
> +static u32 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + u32 val;
> +
> + if (!vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu))
> + val = (vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCR_EL0) >> ARMV8_PMCR_N_SHIFT)
> + & ARMV8_PMCR_N_MASK;
> + else
> + val = (vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMCR) >> ARMV8_PMCR_N_SHIFT)
> + & ARMV8_PMCR_N_MASK;
Indentation? Again, no need to distinguish 32 and 64bit here.
> +
> + return GENMASK(val - 1, 0) | BIT(ARMV8_COUNTER_MASK);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_overflow_clear - clear PMU overflow interrupt
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMOVSCLR register
> + * @reg: the current value of PMOVSCLR register
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_clear(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> +{
> + u32 mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu);
> +
> + if (!vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) &= mask;
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) &= ~val;
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0);
I'm not fond of messing with the sysreg like this. Consider using a
temporary variable.
> + } else {
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET) &= mask;
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET) &= ~val;
> + val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET);
Same here.
> + }
> +
> + /* If all overflow bits are cleared, kick the vcpu to clear interrupt
> + * pending status.
> + */
> + if (val == 0)
> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
Do we really need to do so? This will be dropped on the next entry
anyway, so i don't see the need to kick the vcpu again. Or am I missing
something?
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_overflow_set - set PMU overflow interrupt
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @val: the value guest writes to PMOVSSET register
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_overflow_set(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 val)
> +{
> + u32 mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu);
> +
> + val &= mask;
> + if (val == 0)
> + return;
> +
> + if (!vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu)) {
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) &= mask;
> + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0) |= val;
> + val = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMCNTENSET_EL0)
> + & vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMINTENSET_EL1)
> + & vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMOVSSET_EL0);
Same here.
> + } else {
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET) &= mask;
> + vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET) |= val;
> + val = vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMCNTENSET)
> + & vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMINTENSET)
> + & vcpu_cp15(vcpu, c9_PMOVSSET);
and here.
> + }
> +
> + if (val != 0)
> + kvm_vcpu_kick(vcpu);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type - set selected counter to monitor some event
> * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
>
Thanks,
M.
--
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-08 12:47 [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 01/21] ARM64: Move PMU register related defines to asm/pmu.h Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 02/21] KVM: ARM64: Define PMU data structure for each vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 13:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 13:53 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-08 14:10 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 14:14 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 03/21] KVM: ARM64: Add offset defines for PMU registers Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCR_EL0 register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 05/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSELR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 06/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCEID0 and PMCEID1 register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 14:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 07/21] KVM: ARM64: PMU: Add perf event map and introduce perf event creating function Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 15:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 7:38 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 08/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMEVTYPERn and PMCCFILTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:17 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 09/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMXEVTYPER register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 10/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMEVCNTRn and PMCCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:30 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 11:36 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-10 12:07 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-10 13:23 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 11/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMXEVCNTR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:33 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 8:35 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 8:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 13/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 14/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 16:59 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2015-12-09 8:47 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 15/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMUSERENR register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-09 9:18 ` Shannon Zhao
2015-12-09 9:49 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 16/21] KVM: ARM64: Add reset and access handlers for PMSWINC register Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 17/21] KVM: ARM64: Add helper to handle PMCR register bits Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 18/21] KVM: ARM64: Add PMU overflow interrupt routing Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:37 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 19/21] KVM: ARM64: Reset PMU state when resetting vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 20/21] KVM: ARM64: Free perf event of PMU when destroying vcpu Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 12:47 ` [PATCH v6 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new kvm ARM PMU device Shannon Zhao
2015-12-08 17:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-12-08 17:56 ` [PATCH v6 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Marc Zyngier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56670C5D.3020407@arm.com \
--to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).