From: stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org (Stanimir Varbanov)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: designware: add memory barrier after enabling region
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 12:29:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56680292.60905@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1975309.Hla8QhEqf4@wuerfel>
On 12/09/2015 11:52 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 December 2015 10:10:05 Pratyush Anand wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:31 PM, Stanimir Varbanov
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c | 5 +++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>>>> index 02a7452bdf23..ed4dc2e2553b 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
>>>> @@ -164,6 +164,11 @@ static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu(struct pcie_port *pp, int index,
>>>> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, upper_32_bits(pci_addr), PCIE_ATU_UPPER_TARGET);
>>>> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, type, PCIE_ATU_CR1);
>>>> dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, PCIE_ATU_ENABLE, PCIE_ATU_CR2);
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * ensure that the ATU enable has been happaned before accessing
>>>> + * pci configuration/io spaces through dw_pcie_cfg_[read|write].
>>>> + */
>>>> + wmb();
>>>> }
>>>>
>>
>>
>> My understnading is that since writel() of dw_pcie_writel_rc() in
>> above code and readl(), writel() of dw_pcie_cfg_[read|write]() (which
>> will follow) goes through same device (ie PCIe host here). So, it is
>> guaranteed that 1st writel() will be executed before later
>> readl()/writel(). If that is true then we do not need any explicit
>> barrier here.
>>
>> Arnd, Russel: whats your opinion here.
>
> I think the ordering is only enforced if the two register accesses are
> on the same device as seen from the bus, and it's possible that the
> RC registers and the config space registers are not considered the
> same thing here.
>
> For config write, this is not a problem, because the config space write
> has a wmb() that enforces ordering, but it's possible that the config
> space read may hit the device in parallel with the PCIE_ATU_ENABLE
> write.
Hmm, just a matter of fact - as I described in the patch description
this wmb() fixed an issue with pcie device enumeration (I came down to
pci_bus_read_dev_vendor_id() returns zero) i.e. exactly a pci
configuration space read.
--
regards,
Stan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-09 10:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-03 13:35 [PATCH v4 0/5] Qualcomm PCIe driver and designware fixes Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI: designware: add memory barrier after enabling region Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-08 9:01 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-09 4:40 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-09 9:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-12-09 10:29 ` Stanimir Varbanov [this message]
2015-12-09 10:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-11 4:05 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-11 5:48 ` Jisheng Zhang
2015-12-22 12:36 ` Jingoo Han
2015-12-17 15:45 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-17 15:51 ` Pratyush Anand
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] DT: PCI: qcom: Document PCIe devicetree bindings Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 20:42 ` Rob Herring
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] PCI: qcom: Add Qualcomm PCIe controller driver Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-15 8:24 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-16 21:17 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-16 21:53 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-17 13:18 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-17 21:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: dts: apq8064: add pcie devicetree node Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-03 13:35 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: ifc6410: enable pcie dt node for this board Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-17 21:55 ` Bjorn Andersson
2015-12-18 9:57 ` Stanimir Varbanov
2015-12-07 17:33 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Qualcomm PCIe driver and designware fixes Srinivas Kandagatla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56680292.60905@linaro.org \
--to=stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).