* [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Improve error reporting on set_pte_at() checks
2015-12-09 17:26 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: Non-racy PTE setting in the presence of HW AF/DBM Catalin Marinas
@ 2015-12-09 17:26 ` Catalin Marinas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Catalin Marinas @ 2015-12-09 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Currently the BUG_ON() checks do not give enough information about the
PTEs being set. This patch changes BUG_ON to WARN_ONCE and dumps the
values of the old and new PTEs.
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
index 7e074f93f383..002dc61a4dff 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h
@@ -276,10 +276,13 @@ static inline void set_pte_at(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
* hardware updates of the pte (ptep_set_access_flags safely changes
* valid ptes without going through an invalid entry).
*/
- if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_VM) && IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM) &&
- pte_valid(*ptep)) {
- BUG_ON(!pte_young(pte));
- BUG_ON(pte_write(*ptep) && !pte_dirty(pte));
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_HW_AFDBM) && pte_valid(*ptep)) {
+ VM_WARN_ONCE(!pte_young(pte),
+ "%s: racy access flag clearing: %016llx -> %016llx",
+ __func__, pte_val(*ptep), pte_val(pte));
+ VM_WARN_ONCE(pte_write(*ptep) && !pte_dirty(pte),
+ "%s: racy dirty state clearing: %016llx -> %016llx",
+ __func__, pte_val(*ptep), pte_val(pte));
}
set_pte(ptep, pte);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Improve error reporting on set_pte_at() checks
[not found] <CA+=Sn1kQBoLCY_AidPXPU-2dkqGcfDfZtcnk1gzEukttZ+foOQ@mail.gmail.com>
@ 2015-12-16 11:15 ` James Morse
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: James Morse @ 2015-12-16 11:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Andrew,
On 16/12/15 03:01, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2015 at 17:26:56, Catalin Marinas
> <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:
>>
>> Currently the BUG_ON() checks do not give enough information about the PTEs being set. This patch changes BUG_ON to WARN_ONCE and dumps the values of the old and new PTEs.
>
>
> This change broke building the mantis driver:
>
> In file included from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h:30:0,
> from drivers/media/pci/mantis/mantis_i2c.c:21:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h: In function ?set_pte_at?:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:281:3: error: implicit declaration
> of function ?BUILD_BUG_ON_INVALID?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> VM_WARN_ONCE(!pte_young(pte),
> ^
This is due to a missing include in include/linux/mmdebug.h, which
Julien Grall saw with CONFIG_XEN & !CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. There was some
discussion at [0], and a patch at [1].
The quick-and-dirty workaround is to toggle CONFIG_DEBUG_VM. It should
be fixed in the next rc.
Thanks,
James
[0] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/14/489
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mm/msg98868.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-16 11:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CA+=Sn1kQBoLCY_AidPXPU-2dkqGcfDfZtcnk1gzEukttZ+foOQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-16 11:15 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Improve error reporting on set_pte_at() checks James Morse
2015-12-09 17:26 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: Non-racy PTE setting in the presence of HW AF/DBM Catalin Marinas
2015-12-09 17:26 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: Improve error reporting on set_pte_at() checks Catalin Marinas
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).