From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com (Suzuki K. Poulose) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:03:11 +0000 Subject: [PATCH v4] arm64: run-time detection for aarch32 support In-Reply-To: <1450454429-22976-1-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> References: <1450454429-22976-1-git-send-email-ynorov@caviumnetworks.com> Message-ID: <56743C4F.7060201@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 18/12/15 16:00, Yury Norov wrote: > Kernel option COMPAT defines the ability of executing aarch32 binaries. > Some platforms does not support aarch32 mode, and so cannot execute that > binaries. But we cannot just disable COMPAT for them because the same > kernel binary may be used by multiple platforms. > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h > index 8f271b8..781a2f7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h > @@ -184,6 +184,13 @@ static inline bool system_supports_mixed_endian_el0(void) > return id_aa64mmfr0_mixed_endian_el0(read_system_reg(SYS_ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1)); > } > > +static inline bool system_supports_aarch32_el0(void) > +{ > + u64 pfr0 = read_system_reg(SYS_ID_AA64PFR0_EL1); > + return ((pfr0 >> ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_SHIFT) & ID_AA64PFR0_ELx_MASK) > + != ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_64BIT_ONLY; Could you please use cpuid_feature_extract_field(pfr0, ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_SHIFT) != ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_64BIT_ONLY instead and > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/sysreg.h > @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ > #define ID_AA64PFR0_EL2_SHIFT 8 > #define ID_AA64PFR0_EL1_SHIFT 4 > #define ID_AA64PFR0_EL0_SHIFT 0 > +#define ID_AA64PFR0_ELx_MASK 0xf get rid of ^ ? As per ARM ARM, AArch32 only ID register values are unknown if AArch32 is not implemented. So I think we need to skip accessing the AArch32 ID registers everywhere (feature tracking), if the CPU doesn't supports it, to avoid unnecessary SANITY failures and TAINTing the kernel. Cheers Suzuki