From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: kishon@ti.com (Kishon Vijay Abraham I)
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 14:39:15 +0530
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/8] clk: rockchip: fix usbphy-related clocks
In-Reply-To: <80597401.Y78Rj8FshV@diego>
References: <1447968149-10979-1-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de>
 <1447968149-10979-8-git-send-email-heiko@sntech.de> <566FF0F0.6080803@ti.com>
 <80597401.Y78Rj8FshV@diego>
Message-ID: <5676703B.90300@ti.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi,

On Saturday 19 December 2015 10:51 PM, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> Hi Kishon,
> 
> Am Dienstag, 15. Dezember 2015, 16:22:32 schrieb Kishon Vijay Abraham I:
>> On Friday 20 November 2015 02:52 AM, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>>> The otgphy clocks really only drive the phy blocks. These in turn
>>> contain plls that then generate the 480m clocks the clock controller
>>> uses to supply some other clocks like uart0, gpu or the video-codec.
>>>
>>> So fix this structure to actually respect that hirarchy and removed
>>> that usb480m fixed-rate clock working as a placeholder till now, as
>>> this wouldn't even work if the supplying phy gets turned off while
>>> its pll-output gets used elsewhere.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
>>> Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>>
>> I saw you've given your Acked-by in a previous version of this patch.
>> Do you want me to take this in linux-phy tree?
> 
> from my POV, this series should probably go through your tree in one go, as 
> this patch depends on the newly exposed clocks from the previous patch. So to 
> keep bisectability, it should most likely stay together.

I agree. But I can't take another subsystem patch without getting a clear nod
from the maintainer. I'll wait till tomorrow for Turquette to give his Acked-by.

Thanks
Kishon