From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hanjun.guo@linaro.org (Hanjun Guo) Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 17:38:45 +0800 Subject: [PATCH V2 22/23] pci, acpi: Match PCI config space accessors against platfrom specific quirks. In-Reply-To: References: <1450278993-12664-1-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <1450278993-12664-23-git-send-email-tn@semihalf.com> <567923D2.2010202@semihalf.com> Message-ID: <567A6BA5.1030408@linaro.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 12/22/2015 10:48 PM, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: > Hi Tomasz > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: linux-kernel-owner at vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel- >> owner at vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Tomasz Nowicki >> Sent: 22 December 2015 10:20 >> To: Gabriele Paoloni; bhelgaas at google.com; arnd at arndb.de; >> will.deacon at arm.com; catalin.marinas at arm.com; rjw at rjwysocki.net; >> hanjun.guo at linaro.org; Lorenzo.Pieralisi at arm.com; okaya at codeaurora.org; >> jiang.liu at linux.intel.com; Stefano.Stabellini at eu.citrix.com >> Cc: robert.richter at caviumnetworks.com; mw at semihalf.com; >> Liviu.Dudau at arm.com; ddaney at caviumnetworks.com; tglx at linutronix.de; >> Wangyijing; Suravee.Suthikulpanit at amd.com; msalter at redhat.com; linux- >> pci at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org; linux- >> acpi at vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linaro- >> acpi at lists.linaro.org; jchandra at broadcom.com; jcm at redhat.com >> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 22/23] pci, acpi: Match PCI config space >> accessors against platfrom specific quirks. >> >> On 21.12.2015 12:47, Gabriele Paoloni wrote: >>> 2) In the quirk mechanism you proposed, I see that the callback >> function >>> allows to do some preparation work for the host bridge. For >> example in >>> Hisilicon hip05 case we would need to read some values from the >> ACPI >>> table (see acpi_pci_root_hisi_add() function in >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/3/426). >>> I am quite new to ACPI and I wonder if it is OK to add such >> "Packages" >>> to the PCI host bridge ACPI device...or maybe we need to declare >> a new >>> one...? >> >> I may miss sth so please correct me in that case. >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/3/426 shows that you need special >> handling for root->secondary.start bus number only, right? So how about >> creating special MCFG region only for >> . >> Like that: >> >> [0008] Base Address : >> [0002] Segment Group Number : >> [0001] Start Bus Number : secondary.start> >> [0001] End Bus Number : secondary.start> >> [0004] Reserved : 00000000 >> >> >> static const struct dmi_system_id hisi_quirk[] = { >> { >> .ident = "HiSi...", >> .matches = { >> DMI_MATCH(), >> }, >> }, >> { } >> }; >> >> static struct pci_ops hisi_ecam_pci_ops = { >> .map_bus = pci_mcfg_dev_base, >> .read = hisi_pcie_cfg_read, >> .write = hisi_pcie_cfg_write, >> }; >> >> DECLARE_ACPI_MCFG_FIXUP(hisi_quirk, &hisi_ecam_pci_ops, >> , ); >> >> With above code you can use your custom PCI config accessor only for >> that region. >> >> Let me know if that is not enough for you. > > In principle I think it can work... > > Liudongdong, Guo Hanjun what is your opinion about? Let me and Dongdong prepare a patch for Hip05 and then will back to this discussion to see if we met some problems. Thanks Hanjun