From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 21:07:06 +0100
Subject: net-thunder: One check less in nicvf_register_interrupts() after
 error detection
In-Reply-To: <1452196790.4028.33.camel@perches.com>
References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net>
 <5685A273.6070607@users.sourceforge.net>
 <20160107110701.GE25086@rric.localdomain>
 <568EBCE7.4060502@users.sourceforge.net>
 <1452195846.4028.24.camel@perches.com>
 <568EC2FD.9000702@users.sourceforge.net>
 <1452196790.4028.33.camel@perches.com>
Message-ID: <568EC56A.402@users.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

>> * Which object code representations would you find representative
>>   for a further constructive discussion around this
>>   software component?
> 
> Evidence of actual object code improvement

How do you think about to provide a function implementation
which looks a bit more efficient by default?


> when with compiled with optimizations.

Which combinations of hardware and software would you recommend
for corresponding system checks?

Regards,
Markus